The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage
Abstract
Stories from Nokia, Dell, UPS, Toyota, and other companies show how firms can reduce their vulnerability to high-impact disruptions, from earthquakes to strikes, from SARS to terrorism, and use them for competitive advantage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization
Duchek, S. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 · Cited by 2,027
Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12076 · Cited by 1,682
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958
Organisational resilience: development of a conceptual framework for organisational responses
Burnard, K., & Bhamra, R. (2011) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.563827 · Cited by 704
Boin, A., & van Eeten, M. J. G. (2013) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.769856 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 43-3481-43-3481
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1579570945
- Cited by
- 1,207
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-3481
- The paper
- The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
