The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The economics of microfinance
Abstract
The microfinance revolution, begun with independent initiatives in Latin America and South Asia starting in the 1970s, has so far allowed 65 million poor people around the world to receive small loans without collateral, build up assets, and buy insurance. This comprehensive survey of microfinance seeks to bridge the gap in the existing literature on microfinance between academic economists and practitioners. Both authors have pursued the subject not only in academia but in the field; Beatriz Armendariz founded a microfinance bank in Chiapas, Mexico, and Jonathan Morduch has done fieldwork in Bangladesh, China, and Indonesia. The authors move beyond the usual theoretical focus in the microfinance literature and draw on new developments in theories of contracts and incentives. They challenge conventional assumptions about how poor households save and build assets and how institutions can overcome market failures. The book provides an overview of microfinance by addressing a range of issues, including lessons from informal markets, savings and insurance, the role of women, the place of subsidies, impact measurement, and management incentives. It integrates theory with empirical data, citing studies from Asia, Africa, and Latin America and introducing ideas about asymmetric information, principal-agent theory, and household decision making in the context of microfinance. The Economics of Microfinance can be used by students in economics, public policy, and development studies. Mathematical notation is used to clarify some arguments, but the main points can be grasped without the math. Each chapter ends with analytically challenging exercises for advanced economics students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20130533 · Cited by 2,076
Microcredit in Theory and Practice: Using Randomized Credit Scoring for Impact Evaluation
Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200138 · Cited by 493
Microfinance: Its Impact, Outreach, and Sustainability
Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2011) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.021 · Cited by 458
Does microfinance empower women? Evidence from self‐help groups in India
Swain, R. B., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2009) · International Review of Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/02692170903007540 · Cited by 435
Marketing Systems—A Core Macromarketing Concept
Layton, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/0276146707302836 · Cited by 411
Capital is not enough: Innovation in developing economies
Bradley, S. W., McMullen, J. S., Artz, K., & Simiyu, E. M. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01043.x · Cited by 375
(2011) · The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) · Cited by 284
Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship
Pies, I., Hielscher, S., & Beckmann, M. (2009) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200919322 · Cited by 141
Weng, K. C., Glazier, E., Nicol, S. J., & Hobday, A. J. (2015) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.10.025 · Cited by 17
Impact of microcredit on the performance of micro and small enterprises (MSEs) in Yemen
AL-Maamari, O. A., Aljonaid, N., & Alrefaei, N. (2025) · Cogent Economics & Finance · doi:10.1080/23322039.2025.2460083 · Cited by 10
(2015) · The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 43-3485-43-3485
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2143291331
- Cited by
- 1,319
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.