The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The politics of attention: how government prioritizes problems
Abstract
On any given day, policymakers are required to address a multitude of problems and make decisions about a variety of issues, from the economy and education to health care and defense. This has been true for years, but until now no studies have been conducted on how politicians manage the flood of information from a wide range of sources. How do they interpret and respond to such inundation? Which issues do they pay attention to and why? Bryan D. Jones and Frank R. Baumgartner answer these questions on decision-making processes and prioritization in Politics of Attention. Analyzing fifty years of data, Jones and Baumgartner's book is the first study of American politics based on a new information-processing perspective. The authors bring together the allocation of attention and the operation of governing institutions into a single model that traces public policies, public and media attention to them, and governmental decisions across multiple institutions. Politics of Attention offers a groundbreaking approach to American politics based on the responses of policymakers to the flow of information. It asks how the system solves, or fails to solve, problems rather than looking to how individual preferences are realized through political action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
Geurts, M., Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150485 · Cited by 19,186
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) · Cited by 9,299
Continuous Univariate Distributions.
Omori, Y., Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291547 · Cited by 9,084
The Science of “Muddling Through”
Lindblom, C. E. (1959) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/973677 · Cited by 8,513
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Hsiao, C. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781009057745 · Cited by 7,869
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,834
A Behavioral Theory of the FirmPreprint
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 6,482
Cited by
A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science
Hopkins, D. J., & King, G. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00428.x · Cited by 765
How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs
Quinn, K. M., Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M. H., & Radev, D. R. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.x · Cited by 671
Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis
Weible, C. M. (2008) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x · Cited by 470
Smart literature review: a practical topic modelling approach to exploratory literature review
Asmussen, C. B., & Møller, C. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0255-7 · Cited by 455
The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability
Busuioc, E. M., & Lodge, M. (2016) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12161 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 43-4321-43-4321
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2139680069
- Cited by
- 1,160
- References
- 127
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The politics of attention: how government prioritizes problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-4321
- The paper
- The politics of attention: how government prioritizes problems. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-4321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.