Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 227 of the 227 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New media campaigns and the managed citizen

·2006·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Introduction: the hypermedia campaign 1. Political communication and information technology 2. Producing the hypermedia campaign 3. Learning politics from the hypermedia campaign 4. Organizational communication in the hypermedia campaign 5. Managed citizenship and information technology Appendix: Method notes on studying information technology and political communication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.43-6172

Cites

227 of 227 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 227 references

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
43-6172-43-6172
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W593654456
Cited by
324
References
227
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New media campaigns and the managed citizen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-6172
The paper
New media campaigns and the managed citizen. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-6172

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.