The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mindset: the new psychology of success
Abstract
Every so often a truly groundbreaking idea comes along. This is one. Mindset explains: Why brains and talent don’t bring success How they can stand in the way of it Why praising brains and talent doesn’t foster self-esteem and accomplishment, but jeopardizes them How teaching a simple idea about the brain raises grades and productivity What all great CEOs, parents, teachers, athletes know Mindset is a simple idea discovered by world-renowned Stanford University psychologist Carol Dweck in decades of research on achievement and success—a simple idea that makes all the difference. In a fixed mindset, people believe their basic qualities, like their intelligence or talent, are simply fixed traits. They spend their time documenting their intelligence or talent instead of developing them. They also believe that talent alone creates success—without effort. They’re wrong. In a growth mindset, people believe that their most basic abilities can be developed through dedication and hard work—brains and talent are just the starting point. This view creates a love of learning and a resilience that is essential for great accomplishment. Virtually all great people have had these qualities. Teaching a growth mindset creates motivation and productivity in the worlds of business, education, and sports. It enhances relationships. When you read Mindset, you’ll see how.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In other words, the D&D model for educational change does not support the development of a growth mindset [21] and it does not give attention to the development of reflective practice.”
From Faculty online learning communities: A model for sustained teaching transformation (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“In addition, personalized instruction can foster a growth mindset, which has been shown to promote students’ persistence in the face of difficulties16,17.”
From AI tutoring outperforms in-class active learning: an RCT introducing a novel research-based design in an authentic educational setting (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308325693 · Cited by 3,686
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859 · Cited by 2,368
Motivation and social cognitive theory
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 · Cited by 2,416
Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315697048 · Cited by 1,977
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 44-2397-44-2397
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1522024619
- Cited by
- 7,804
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 482 · 2024: 731 · 2023: 717 · 2022: 572 · 2021: 793 · 2020: 831 · 2019: 773 · 2018: 620 · 2017: 521 · 2016: 452 · 2015: 392 · 2014: 244 · 2013: 209 · 2012: 159
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- growth mindset, fixed mindset, Carol Dweck, self-esteem, achievement, talent, effort, motivation, resilience, praise, learning, productivity, sport, corporate leadership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review