The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2007
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., & Morrison, D. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 · Cited by 4,771
The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_1 · Cited by 3,322
Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits
Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S., Shpritz, L., Fitton, L., Saffouri, R., et al. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.267.5201.1117 · Cited by 2,861
Rethinking the concept of acculturation: Implications for theory and research.
Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., & Szapocznik, J. (2010) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0019330 · Cited by 2,226
Research on Divorce: Continuing Trends and New Developments
Amato, P. R. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x · Cited by 1,918
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2007-12-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 45-1769-45-1769
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W117319559
- Cited by
- 2,398
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2007. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.45-1769
- The paper
- Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2007. (2007). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-1769
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
