The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A commentary on Herodotus books I-IV
Abstract
Compte-rendu de la publication de D. Asheri, A. Lloyd et A. Corcella (Edited by O. Murray and A. Moreno, with a Contribution by M. Brosius. Translated by B. Graziosi, M. Rossetti, C. Dus, V. Cazzato ; Oxford, 2007)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Best practice. Religious reformation in Philo’s representation of the Therapeutae and Therapeutrides
Standhartinger, A. (2017) · Beyond Priesthood · doi:10.1515/9783110448184-006 · Cited by 3
“ See, for example, the first four books of Herodotus, with the commentaries in Asheri et al. (2007); and esp.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivantchik, A.
- Affiliations
- Université Bordeaux Montaigne (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Askold Ivantchik
- ORCID
- Askold Ivantchik
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 45-3621-45-3621
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1588991125
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 19 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Keywords
- Herodotus, Greek historiography, ancient Greek literature, textual commentary, critical edition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A commentary on Herodotus books I-IV. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.45-3621
- The paper
- Ivantchik, A. (2008). A commentary on Herodotus books I-IV. Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-3621
