Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945-1975
Abstract
Acknowledgments vii List of Abbreviations ix CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: The Expansion and Critiques of Science-Military Ties, 1945-1970 22 CHAPTER 3: Scientists as Moral Individuals: Quakerism and the Society for Social Responsibility in 54 CHAPTER 4: Information and Political Neutrality: Liberal Activism and the St. Louis Committee for Nuclear Information 96 CHAPTER 5: Confronting Liberalism: The Anti-Vietnam War Movement and the ABM Debate, 1965-1969 130 CHAPTER 6: Doing Science for the People: Enactments of a New Left Politics of 158 CHAPTER 7: Conclusions: Disrupting the Social and Moral Order of 190 Notes 215 Bibliography 269 Index 293 -
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Community engagement in research has a long history outside of autism, most notably with regard to HIV and Aboriginal and First Nations communities.
“Community engagement in research has a long history outside of autism, most notably with regard to HIV (Epstein, 1996; Moore, 2008) and Aboriginal and First Nations communities (National Health & Medical Research Council, 1991).”
From Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science (2022) · cites this paper as Moore, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gauchat, G. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122412438225 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science
Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13534 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom
Pellicano, E., Dinsmore, A., & Charman, T. (2014) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361314529627 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
“Not only does this account unpersuasively imply that researchers are bias-free (which is not the case; Moore, 2008), but it also suggests that the only people permitted to shape the ongoing debate about autism research and to direct the allocation of scarce resources are autism researchers…”
Background
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 45-6753-45-6753
- ISSN
- 0009-4978
- 1523-8253
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
