The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Software testing and analysis: process, principles, and techniques
Open accessAbstract
The first comprehensive book on software test and analysis You can't "test quality into" a software product, but neither can you build a quality software product without test and analysis. Software test and analysis is increasingly recognized, in research and in industrial practice, as a core challenge in software engineering and computer science. Software Testing and Analysis: Process, Principles, and Techniques is the first book to present a range of complementary software test and analysis techniques in an integrated, coherent fashion. It covers a full spectrum of topics from basic principles and underlying theory to organizational and process issues in real-world application. The emphasis throughout is on selecting a complementary set of practical techniques to achieve an acceptable level of quality at an acceptable cost. Highlights of the book include: Interplay among technical and non-technical issues in crafting an approach to software quality, with chapters devoted to planning and monitoring the software quality process. A selection of practical techniques ranging from inspection to automated program and design analyses to unit, integration, system, and regression testing, with technical material set in the context of real-world problems and constraints in software development. A coherent view of the state of the art and practice, with technical and organizational approaches to push the state of practice toward the state of the art. Throughout, the text covers techniques that are suitable for near-term application, with sufficient technical background to help you know how and when to apply them. Exercises reinforce the instruction and ensure that you master each topic before proceeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation, Verification, and Testing of Computer Software
Adrion, W. R., Branstad, M. A., & Cherniavsky, J. C. (1982) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/356876.356879 · Cited by 426
Methodology for the Generation of Program Test Data
Howden, W. E. (1975) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/t-c.1975.224259 · Cited by 196
Cited by
An orchestrated survey of methodologies for automated software test case generation
Anand, S., Burke, E. K., Chen, T. Y., Clark, J., Cohen, M. B., Grieskamp, W., Harman, M., Harrold, M. J., McMinn, P., Bertolino, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.061 · Cited by 668
The software model checker Blast: Applications to software engineering
Beyer, D., Henzinger, T. A., Jhala, R., & Majumdar, R. (2007) · International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10009-007-0044-z · Cited by 585
Software Testing With Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and Vision
Wang, J., Huang, Y., Chen, C., Liu, Z., Wang, S., & Wang, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3368208 · Cited by 573
Testing machine learning based systems: a systematic mapping
Riccio, V., Jahangirova, G., Stocco, A., Humbatova, N., Weiss, M., & Tonella, P. (2020) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-020-09881-0 · Cited by 251
Metamorphic testing for software quality assessment: A study of search engines
Zhou, Z. Q., Xiang, S., & Chen, T. Y. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2015.2478001 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2008-10-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 46-0935-46-0935
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1524053243
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 2
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software testing and analysis: process, principles, and techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-0935
- The paper
- Software testing and analysis: process, principles, and techniques. (2008). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-0935
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.