The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foundations of quantum physics
Abstract
Some aspects of the interpretation of quantum theory are discussed.It is emphasized that quantum theory is formulated in a Cartesian coordinate system; in other coordinates the result obtained with the help of the Hamiltonian formalism and commutator relations between 'canonically conjugated' coordinate and momentum operators leads to a wrong version of quantum mechanics.In this connection the Feynman integral formalism is also discussed.In this formalism the measure is not well-defined and there is no idea how to distinguish between the true version of quantum mechanics and an incorrect one; it is rather a mnemonic rule to generate perturbation series from an undefined zero order term.The origin of time is analyzed in detail by the example of atomic collisions.It is shown that the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for the closed three-body (two nuclei + electron) system has no physical meaning since in the high impact energy limit it transforms into an equation with two independent time-like variables; the time appears in the stationary Schrödinger equation as a result of extraction of a classical subsystem (two nuclei) from a closed three-body system.Following the Einstein-Rosen-Podolsky experiment and Bell's inequality the wave function is interpreted as an actual field of information in the elementary form.The relation between physics and mathematics is also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals
(1966) · Students Quarterly Journal · doi:10.1049/sqj.1966.0063 · Cited by 9,537
Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles
Newton, R. G. (1982) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-88128-2 · Cited by 4,212
Principles of Quantum Mechanics
Basdevant, J.-L. (2016) · Graduate Texts in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43479-7_6 · Cited by 434
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!
Tamari, V., & Feynman, R. P. (1986) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1578389 · Cited by 412
Cited by
Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?
Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001525 · Cited by 440
Geometrization of quantum mechanics
Kibble, T. W. B. (1979) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01225149 · Cited by 340
Experimental test of nonlocal quantum correlation in relativistic configurations
Zbinden, H., Brendel, J., Gisin, N., & Tittel, W. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.022111 · Cited by 143
Quantum cognition based on an ambiguous representation derived from a rough set approximation
Gunji, Y.-P., Sonoda, K., & Basios, V. (2016) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.12.003 · Cited by 41
Horwitz, L. P. (2007) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-007-9127-7 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 46-4502-46-4502
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1535155962
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 4
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foundations of quantum physics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-4502
- The paper
- Foundations of quantum physics. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-4502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.