Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,118

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strategic leadership: theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards

·2009·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE DEDICATION 1. The Study of Top Executives 2. Do Top Executives Matter? 3. How Individual Differences Affect Executive Action 4. Executive Experiences and Organizational Outcomes 5. Top Management Teams 6. Changes at the Top: The Antecedents of Executive Turnover and Succession 7. Changes at the Top: The Consequences of Executive Turnover and Succession 8. Understanding Board Structure, Composition, and Vigilance 9. The Consequences of Board Involvement and Vigilance 10. The Determinants of Executive Compensation 11. Executive Compensation: Consequences and Distributions REFERENCES LIST OF TABLES ENDNOTES

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.46-5122

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,118

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2009-05-01
Volume
46
Issue
09
Pages
46-5122-46-5122
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W354207550
Cited by
2,118
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic leadership: theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-5122
The paper
Strategic leadership: theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-5122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.