Imperial Politics and Symbolics in Ancient Japan: The Tenmu Dynasty, 650-800
Abstract
Imperial Politics and Symbolics is an ambitious and ground-breaking study that offers a new understanding of a formative stage in the development of the Japanese state. The late seventh and eighth centuries were a time of momentous change in Japan, much of it brought about by the short-lived Tenmu dynasty. Two new capital cities, a bureaucratic state led by an imperial ruler, and Chinese-style law codes were just a few of the innovations instituted by the new regime. Herman Ooms presents both a wide-ranging and fine-grained examination of the power struggles, symbolic manipulations, new mythological constructs, and historical revisions that both defined and propelled these changes.In addition to a vast amount of research in Japanese sources, the author draws on a wealth of Sinological scholarship in English, German, and French to illuminate the politics and symbolics of the time. An important feature of the book is the way it opens up early Japanese history to considerations of continental influences. Rulers and ritual specialists drew on several religious and ritual idioms, including Daoism, Buddhism, yin-yang hermeneutics, and kami worship, to articulate and justify their innovations. In looking at the religious symbols that were deployed in support of the state, Ooms gives special attention to the Daoist dimensions of the new political symbolics as well as to the crucial contributions made by successive generations of 'immigrants' from the Korean peninsula.From the beginni…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Under the ritsuryō state, the emperor at the national level and provincial officials at the local level were responsible for coordinating rites for interceding with vengeful kami.
“Under the ritsuryō state, it was the emperor at the national level and provincial officials ( kokushi 国司 ) at the local level who were responsible for coordinating rites for interceding with vengeful kami (Okada 2019, 234-235; Ooms 2009, 109; Piggott 1997, 208; Miller 1971).”
From The Mountain as Mandala: Kūkai’s Founding of Mt. Kōya (2020) · cites this paper as Ooms 2009, 109
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 121
- Authors
- Ooms, H.
- Corresponding author
- Herman Ooms
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 46-5778-46-5778
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1500759010
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- imperial politics, political symbolism, Japanese state formation, Kojiki, Nihon Shoki, Daoism, Buddhism, kami worship, Korean immigrants, imperial legitimation, continental influence, ancient Japan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review