The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Standards and their stories: how quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life
Abstract
Standardization is one of the defining aspects of modern life, its presence so pervasive that it is usually taken for granted. However cumbersome, onerous, or simply puzzling certain standards may be, their fundamental purpose in streamlining procedures, regulating behaviors, and predicting results is rarely questioned. Indeed, the invisibility of and the imperative of standardizing processes signify their absolute necessity. Increasingly, however, social scientists are beginning to examine the origins and effects of the standards that underpin the technology and practices of everyday life.Standards and Their Stories explores how we interact with the network of standards that shape our lives in ways both obvious and invisible. The main chapters analyze standardization in biomedical research, government bureaucracies, the insurance industry, labor markets, and computer technology, providing detailed accounts of the invention of standard humans for medical testing and life insurance actuarial tables, the imposition of chronological age as a biographical determinant, the accepted means of determining labor productivity, the creation of international standards for the preservation and access of metadata, and the global consequences of ASCII imperialism and the use of English as the lingua franca of the Internet.Accompanying these in-depth critiques are a series of examples that depict an almost infinite variety of standards, from the controversies surrounding the European Union's supposed regulation of banana curvature to the minimum health requirements for immigrants at Ellis Island, conflicting (and ever-increasing) food portion sizes, and the impact of standardized punishment metrics like Three Strikes laws. The volume begins with a pioneering essay from Susan Leigh Star and Martha Lampland on the nature of standards in everyday life that brings together strands from the several fields represented in the book. In an appendix, the editors provide a guide for teaching courses in this emerging interdisciplinary field, which they term infrastructure studies, making Standards and Their Stories ideal for scholars, students, and those curious about why coffins are becoming wider, for instance, or why the Financial Accounting Standards Board refused to classify September 11 as an extraordinary event.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept
Leigh Star, S. (2010) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243910377624 · Cited by 2,375
A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization
Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629 · Cited by 1,226
Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., & Mouritsen, J. (2017) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002 · Cited by 349
Gardner, J. (2013) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312713483678 · Cited by 243
Making Standards Stick: A Theory of Coupled vs. Decoupled Compliance
Sandholtz, K. W. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612443623 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 46-6522-46-6522
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W586932544
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standards and their stories: how quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-6522
- The paper
- Standards and their stories: how quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-6522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.