The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The empire project: the rise and fall of the British world-system, 1830-1970
Abstract
ORIGINS After mercantilismFrom the 1830s onwards, the Victorians gradually transformed their sprawling legacy of war and mercantilism into a world-system much of whose fabric survived into the late 1940s.Yet they did not do so to a conscious plan, nor under the influence of a master ideology.Victorian imperialists were drawn from different interests and classes.They were driven by motives that were at times contradictory.Rival visions of empire pulled them in different directions.Nor could they count on a source of irresistible power to carry them forward wherever they chose.British firepower and capital formed a limited stock for which, at any one time, there were competing demands.The scope for enlarging British influence or territory was not just a function of British wishes or needs.It also depended upon many factors and forces outside the control of -perhaps even unknown to -British interests and agents.Hence, much of their handiwork followed the law of unintended consequences.However clear-sighted the prophet, it would not have been easy to foresee the path followed by British expansion between 1830 and 1880.It would have been harder still to envisage the societies that it helped to create both overseas and at home in the British Isles.The imperial system that the Victorians made emerged by default not from design.Once we concede that there was nothing inevitable about the extraordinary course of Victorian imperialism, we can begin to explore the gravitational field that governed British expansion: propelling it forward in some places; holding it back in others; bending and twisting its impact; raising or lowering its costs; imposing or concealing its contemporary meaning.The starting point must be the play of geopolitical
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Historians and political theorists attribute the ending of the colonialism systems to various factors such as their economic exhaustion, opposition from the nationalists and the change in the international standards after the Second World War (Louis, 2006;Darwin, 2009).”
From World War II, The Decline of British Imperial Power, and The Political Ascendancy of The All-India Muslim League (1939–1947) (2025) · cites this paper as Darwin, 2009
In the citing paper
“The Second World War forever changed the ability of Britain to rule India.Britain's finances and military commitments on so many fronts of war and the rising international pressure for decolonisation made it hard for Britain to keep control of the empire.”
From World War II, The Decline of British Imperial Power, and The Political Ascendancy of The All-India Muslim League (1939–1947) (2025) · cites this paper as Darwin, 2009
In the citing paper
“The war proved to be highly destructive for the economic, military and administrative power of Britain and it had become difficult to keep the control of the British in India.”
From World War II, The Decline of British Imperial Power, and The Political Ascendancy of The All-India Muslim League (1939–1947) (2025) · cites this paper as Darwin, 2009
In the citing paper
“In Britain, the economic and military crises diminished their ability to hold on to British colonies, and led their decision makers to wonder whether it was worth investing in India (Darwin, 2009).”
From World War II, The Decline of British Imperial Power, and The Political Ascendancy of The All-India Muslim League (1939–1947) (2025) · cites this paper as Darwin, 2009
In the citing paper
“British military dominance was challenged by the fall of Singapore in 1942 and the loss of Southeast Asia, leading to a loss of legitimacy of colonial rule (Darwin, 2009).”
From World War II, The Decline of British Imperial Power, and The Political Ascendancy of The All-India Muslim League (1939–1947) (2025) · cites this paper as Darwin, 2009
Citations
Cited by
Irshad, M. (2025) · Journal of Political Stability Archive · doi:10.63468/jpsa.3.4.107
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2010-04-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 47-4636-47-4636
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1512065616
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Australian History and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
- Keywords
- British imperialism, Victorian imperialism, mercantilism, British expansion, geopolitics, colonialism, British Empire, colonial society
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review