The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Empires in world history: power and the politics of difference
Abstract
List of Illustrations vii Preface xi Chapter 1: Imperial Trajectories 1 Chapter 2: Imperial Rule in Rome and China 23 Chapter 3: After Rome: Empire, Christianity, and Islam 61 Chapter 4: Eurasian Connections: The Mongol Empires 93 Chapter 5: Beyond the Mediterranean: Ottoman and Spanish Empires 117 Chapter 6: Oceanic Economies and Colonial Societies: Europe, Asia, and the Americas 149 Chapter 7: Beyond the Steppe: Empire-Building in Russia and China 185 Chapter 8: Empire, Nation, and Citizenship in a Revolutionary Age 219 Chapter 9: Empires across Continents: The United States and Russia 251 Chapter 10: Imperial Repertoires and Myths of Modern Colonialism 287 Chapter 11: Sovereignty and Empire: Nineteenth-Century Europe and Its Near Abroad 331 Chapter 12: War and Revolution in a World of Empires: 1914 to 1945 369 Chapter 13: End of Empire? 413 Chapter 14: Empires, States, and Political Imagination 443 Suggested Reading and Citations 461 Index 481
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Beginning with colonialism, we see immediately that this has a much larger timeframe than that of historical archaeology”
From The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts, an Introduction: Provincializing Historical Archaeology (2011) · cites this paper as Burbank and Cooper 2010
In the citing paper
“even within historical archaeology, the precise edges of where colonialism begins and ends - the pre- and post-colonial periods - are really not so clear (Burbank and Cooper 2010; Horning, this volume; Palus, this volume; Russell, this volume; Silliman 2005; Stein 2005a).”
From The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts, an Introduction: Provincializing Historical Archaeology (2011) · cites this paper as Burbank and Cooper 2010
In the citing paper
“Within this general field as scholars look to examine the differences in colonialism over time, they struggle to see clear chronological epochs in colonialism.”
From The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts, an Introduction: Provincializing Historical Archaeology (2011) · cites this paper as Burbank and Cooper 2010
Citations
Cited by
Croucher, S. K., & Weiss, L. (2011) · Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0192-6_1 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2010-12-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 48-2222-48-2222
- ISSN
- 0009-4978
- 1523-8253
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
