The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The school-to-prison pipeline: structuring legal reform
Abstract
The “school-to-prison pipeline” is an emerging trend that pushes large numbers of at-risk youth - particularly children of color - out of classrooms and into the juvenile justice system. The policies and practices that contribute to this trend can be seen as a pipeline with many entry points, from under-resourced K-12 public schools, to the over-use of zero-tolerance suspensions and expulsions and to the explosion of policing and arrests in public schools. The confluence of these practices threatens to prepare an entire generation of children for a future of incarceration.In this comprehensive study of the relationship between American law and the school-to-prison pipeline, co-authors Catherine Y. Kim, Daniel J. Losen, and Damon T. Hewitt analyze the current state of the law for each entry point on the pipeline and propose legal theories and remedies to challenge them. Using specific state-based examples and case studies, the authors assert that law can be an effective weapon in the struggle to reduce the number of children caught in the pipeline, address the devastating consequences of the pipeline on families and communities, and ensure that our public schools and juvenile justice system further the goals for which they were created: to provide meaningful, safe opportunities for all the nation’s children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability
Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511 · Cited by 1,272
Black Girls and School Discipline: The Complexities of Being Overrepresented and Understudied
Annamma, S. A., Anyon, Y., Joseph, N. M., Farrar, J., Greer, E., Downing, B., & Simmons, J. (2019) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085916646610 · Cited by 299
Behind School Doors: The Impact of Hostile Racial Climates on Urban Teachers of Color
Kohli, R. (2018) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085916636653 · Cited by 257
Annamma, S., Morrison, D., & Jackson, D. (2014) · Berkeley Review of Education · doi:10.5070/b85110003 · Cited by 91
Kupchik, A., & Catlaw, T. J. (2015) · Youth & Society · doi:10.1177/0044118x14544675 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2011-08-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 48-7200-48-7200
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W40795320
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The school-to-prison pipeline: structuring legal reform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.48-7200
- The paper
- The school-to-prison pipeline: structuring legal reform. (2011). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-7200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.