More beautiful and more terrible: the embrace and transcendence of racial inequality in the United States
Abstract
Acknowledgments Preface Introduction 1 It Wasn't Me! Post-Intent and Correlational Racism 2 It's All of Us The Practice of Inequality 3 Telling Tales Out of School The Work of Racial Narratives 4 The House That Jack Built Inequality via Category 5 I Always Feel Like Somebody's Watchin' Me The Racing of Privacy, Voyeurism, and Surveillance 6 Exceptionally Yours Racial Escape Hatches in the Contemporary United States 7 Black Taxes and White Wages The Social Economy of Race Conclusion Remediation, or from Proof to Possibility Notes Index About the Author
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Algorithmic discrimination is not limited to police work; the carceral state embraces schools, hospitals, and other institutions that seek to control poor and racialized people.
“schools, hospitals, and other institutions that seek to control poor and racialized people (Perry 2011, Taylor 2016).”
From Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination (2016) · cites this paper as Perry 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination
Benjamin, R. (2016) · Engaging Science, Technology, and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2016.70 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
- Authors
- Perry, I.
- Corresponding author
- Imani Perry
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2011-11-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 49-1786-49-1786
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1540680554
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- racial inequality, racism, racial narratives, surveillance, privacy, voyeurism, racial wage gap, remediation, racial classification, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
