The logic of chance: the nature and origin of biological evolution
Abstract
species, but rather affects concrete groups of interbreeding individuals, termed populations. The size and structure of the evolving population largely determines the trajectory and outcome of evolution. In particular, Fisher formulated and proved the fundamental theorem of natural selection (commonly known as Fisher’s theorem), which states that the intensity of selection (and, hence, the rate of evolution due to selection) is proportional to the magnitude of the standing genetic variation in an evolving population, which, in turn, is proportional to the effective population size. Box 1-1 gives the basic definitions and equations that determine the effects of mutation and selection on the elimination or fixation of 8 the logic of chance mutant alleles, depending on the effective population size. The qualitative bottom line is that, given the same mutation rate, in a population with a large effective size, selection is intense. In this case, even mutations with a small positive selection coefficient (“slightly” beneficial mutations) quickly come to fixation. On the other hand, mutations with even a small negative selection coefficient (slightly deleterious mutations) are rapidly eliminated. This effect found its rigorous realization in Fisher’s theorem. Box 1-1: The fundamental relationships defining the roles of selection and drift in the evolution of populations Nearly neutral evolution dominated by drift
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For early protein evolution to occur, high-fidelity translation was essential, and given that the different aaRS specificities had not yet evolved, the specificity of amino acid-codon correspondence was determined by RNA molecules.
“Clearly, for this early protein evolution to occur, high-fidelity translation was essential, and given that the different aaRS specificities had not yet evolved, the inevitable conclusion was that the specificity of amino acid-codon correspondence was determined by RNA molecules (41).”
From Origin and Evolution of the Universal Genetic Code (2017) · cites this paper as [41]
The deepest, most ancient split in the prokaryotic world is that separating eubacteria from archaebacteria.
“That dichotomy is also mirrored by a number of other cellular, molecular and gene homology attributes, indicating that the deepest, most ancient split in the prokaryotic world is that separating eubacteria from archaebacteria [111,116,122].”
From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [111]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 391
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2012-03-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 49-3845-49-3845
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2776322201
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- evolution, Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection, effective population size, genetic drift, standing genetic variation, mutation-selection balance, allele fixation, slightly deleterious mutations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review