The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Narrative theory: core concepts and critical debates
Open accessAbstract
As rhetorical narrative theorists, we look at narrative primarily as a rhetorical act rather than as an object.That is, we see it as a purposive communication of a certain kind from one person (or group of persons) to one or more others.More specifically, our default starting point is the following skeletal definition: Narrative is somebody telling somebody else, on some occasion, and for some purposes, that something happened to someone or something.every part of this definition after "is" deserves further commentary-and we will provide such commentary in the following chapters.Before we do so, however, we'd like to start out by identifying six main principles that underlie our approach.1. Narrative is often treated as a representation of a linked sequence of events, but we subsume that traditional viewpoint under a broader conception of narrative as itself an event-more specifically, a multidimensional purposive communication from a teller to an audience.The focus on narrative as purposive means that we are interested in the ways in which the elements of any narrative (e.g., character, setting, plot structure) are shaped in the service of larger ends.The focus on narrative as multileveled communication means that we are interested not simply in the meaning of narrative but also in the experience of it.Thus, we are as concerned with narrative's affective, ethical, and aesthetic effects-and with their interactions-as we are with its thematic meanings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kukkonen, K. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190050955.001.0001 · Cited by 103
Environment and Narrative: New Directions in Econarratology
James, E., & Morel, E. (2020) · Ohio State University Press eBooks · doi:10.26818/9780814214206 · Cited by 89
What the music said: narrative listening across cultures
Margulis, E. H., Wong, P. C. M., Simchy-Gross, R., & McAuley, J. D. (2019) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0363-1 · Cited by 75
“Since notions of story structure vary interculturally (Herman et al., 2012), as do musical systems (Gourlay, 1984), it is uncertain how the phenomenon of narrative listening might extend across cultures.”
BackgroundMore Than One Way to Tell a Story: A Configurational Approach to Storytelling in Crowdfunding
Anglin, A. H., Reid, S. W., & Short, J. C. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587221082679 · Cited by 70
“…other fields, such as marketing and psychology, illustrates that stories use specific elements, such as characters, conflict, and setting as tools to tie the events, themes, and messages of a story together and that these elements enable stories to resonate with an audience (Herman et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialQueer Narrative Theory and the Relationality of Form
Bradway, T. (2021) · PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America · doi:10.1632/s0030812921000407 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Herman, D., Phelan, J. B., Rabinowitz, P. J., Richardson, B., & Warhol, R.
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2012-10-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 50-0710-50-0710
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1556120649
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) (submittedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Communication › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- narrative theory, narrative meaning, narrative structure, character, setting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review