The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Masters of the planet: the search for our human origins
Abstract
Fifty thousand years ago - merely a blip in evolutionary time - our Homo sapiens ancestors were competing for existence with several other human species, just as their precursors had done for millions of years. Yet something about our species distinguished it from the pack, and ultimately led to its survival while the rest became extinct. Just what was it that allowed Homo sapiens to become masters of the planet? Ian Tattersall, curator emeritus at the American Museum of Natural History, takes us deep into the fossil record to uncover what made humans so special. Surveying a vast field from initial bipedality to language and intelligence, Tattersall argues that Homo sapiens acquired a winning combination of traits that was not the result of long-term evolutionary refinement. Instead, the final result emerged quickly, shocking our world and changing it forever.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How Could Language Have Evolved?
Bolhuis, J. J., Tattersall, I., Chomsky, N., & Berwick, R. C. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934 · Cited by 335
Why Was Human Evolution So Rapid?
Tattersall, I. (2017) · Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_1 · Cited by 15
The curiously long absence of cooking in evolutionary thought
Wrangham, R. (2016) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-016-0223-4 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2012-12-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 50-2158-50-2158
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1600478484
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Masters of the planet: the search for our human origins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.50-2158
- The paper
- Masters of the planet: the search for our human origins. (2012). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-2158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.