The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reinventing professionalism: journalism and news in global perspective
Abstract
Acknowledgments vi Introduction 1 1 Paths to Professionalism 19 2 The Dilemmas of Professional Autonomy 43 3 The Ambiguities of Professional Journalism 73 4 Questioning Professional Journalism 94 5 The Professional Logic of Journalism 121 6 Professionalism and Media Patrimonialism 149 7 The Globalization of Professional Cultures 174 8 Post-Professional Journalism? 202 Conclusion: Reinventing Professionalism 222 References 234 Index 263
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fisher, C., Culloty, E., Lee, J. Y., & Park, S. (2019) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1519375 · Cited by 35
Salaudeen, M. A. (2022) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2021.1892517 · Cited by 20
Vainikka, E., Soronen, A., & Kallio, S.-M. (2025) · Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies · doi:10.1177/17496020241269277 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2013-05-22
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 50-5426-50-5426
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1586134066
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
