Never let a serious crisis go to waste: how neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown
Abstract
At the onset of the Great Recession, as house prices sank and joblessness soared, many commentators thought that neoliberalism itself was in its death throes. And yet it seems that - post-apocalypse - we've woken into a second nightmare more ghastly than the first: a political class still blaming government intervention, a global drive for austerity, stagflation, and exploding sovereign debt crises. The economics profession has weathered the crisis by pumping noise and confusion into our attempts to understand the unfolding disasters. Philip Mirowski argues that, as in classic studies of cognitive dissonance, neoliberal thought has become so pervasive that any countervailing evidence serves only to further convince disciples of its ultimate truth. Once neoliberalism became a Theory of Everything - a revolutionary account of self, knowledge, information, markets, and government - it could no longer be falsified by mere data from the real economy. In this sharp, witty and deeply informed account - taking no prisoners in his pursuit of zombie economists - Mirowski surveys the wreckage of what passes for economic thought, and finally provides the basis for an anti-neoliberal account of the current crisis and our future prospects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soil “ecosystem” services and natural capital: critical appraisal of research on uncertain ground
Baveye, P. C., Baveye, J., & Gowdy, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2016.00041 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved?
Saltelli, A., & Giampietro, M. (2017) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.012 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Zuboff, S. (2022) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877221129290 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Future-Proofing Capitalism: The Paradox of the Circular Economy for Plastics
Mah, A. (2021) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00594 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Profit and Gift in the Digital Economy
Elder-Vass, D. (2016) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316536421 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mirowski, P.
- Corresponding author
- Philip Mirowski
- ORCID
- Philip Mirowski
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2013-10-21
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 51-1602-51-1602
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1581099518
- Cited by
- 1,321
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 42 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 213 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 109 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Economic and Social Issues
- Keywords
- neoliberalism, Great Recession, financial crisis, austerity, cognitive dissonance, economics profession, falsifiability, anti-neoliberalism, economic thought, state intervention, sovereign debt crisis, stagflation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review