The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The Development of thinking and reasoning
Open accessAbstract
Thinking and reasoning are key activities for human beings. In this book a distinguished set of contributors provides a wide readership with up-to-date scientific advances in the developmental psychology of thinking and reasoning, both at the theoretical and empirical levels. The first part of the book illustrates how modern approaches to the study of thinking and reasoning have gone beyond the Piagetian legacy: through the investigation of avenues previously not explored, and by demonstrating that young children have higher capacities than was assumed within the Piagetian tradition. The second part focuses upon theoretical and empirical investigations of the interplay between logic and intuition in reasoning and decision making, and how these forms of thinking evolve with age, through the general framework of what is known as dual-process theories. Contrary to Piaget's claim, it becomes apparent that elaborate adult reasoning could rely on some form of intuition. The Development of Thinking and Reasoning provides psychologists, educators and everyone interested in child development with an integrated and up-to-date series of chapters, written by prominent specialists in the areas of thinking, reasoning, and decision making.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Improvement of the efficiency of working memory with age increases the ability to think about abstract and hypothetical things, situations and norms and values.
“Improvement of the efficiency of working memory with age further increases the ability to think about abstract and hypothetical things, situations and norms and values [34, 41].”
From Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects (2017) · cites this paper as [34]
Children at the age of 6 to 8 already demonstrate the ability for logic reasoning.
“Children at the age of 6 to 8 already demonstrate the ability for logic reasoning [34, 35].”
From Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects (2017) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrouillet, P., & Gauffroy, C.
- ORCID
- Pierre Barrouillet
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2013-10-21
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 51-1771-51-1771
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2481451996
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- thinking, reasoning, child development, Piagetian theory, intuition, logic, dual-process theory, decision-making, cognitive development, reasoning development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review