The Great Name: Ancient Egyptian Royal Titulary
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Leprohon states that it was a family's duty to keep the memory of a deceased relative alive, and the phrase "to cause the name to live" was applied to one's father, mother, or grandfather, and even to a brother causing his sibling's name to live.
“Ronald J. Leprohon (2013, p. 6) aptly avers, “In the end, it was a family’s duty to keep the memory of a deceased relative alive, as the ubiquitous phrase ‘to cause the name to live’ (s “ nh < rn) was applied to one’s father, mother, or grandfather.We even encounter a brother causing his sibling’s name to live.””
From Killing Pharaohs in Exodus: The Anonymity of the Egyptian Kings, the Deconstruction of Their Individuality, and the Egyptian Practice of Damnatio Memoriae (2023) · cites this paper as Leprohon 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2014-01-21
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 51-3009-51-3009
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W643184097
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- royal titulary, Pharaoh, Egyptian royal names, Egyptian kingship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
