The son also rises: surnames and the history of social mobility
Abstract
Preface ix 1 Introduction: Of Ruling Classes and Underclasses: The Laws of Social Mobility 1 PART I Social Mobility by Time and Place 2 Sweden: Mobility Achieved? 19 3 The United States: Land of Opportunity 45 4 Medieval England: Mobility in the Feudal Age 70 5 Modern England: The Deep Roots of the Present 88 6 A Law of Social Mobility 107 7 Nature versus Nurture 126 PART II Testing the Laws of Mobility 8 India: Caste, Endogamy, and Mobility 143 9 China and Taiwan: Mobility after Mao 167 10 Japan and Korea: Social Homogeneity and Mobility 182 11 Chile: Mobility among the Oligarchs 199 12 The Law of Social Mobility and Family Dynamics 212 13 Protestants, Jews, Gypsies, Muslims, and Copts: Exceptions to the Law of Mobility? 228 14 Mobility Anomalies 253 PART III The Good Society 15 Is Mobility Too Low? Mobility versus Inequality 261 16 Escaping Downward Social Mobility 279 Appendix 1: Measuring Social Mobility 287 Appendix 2: Deriving Mobility Rates from Surname Frequencies 296 Appendix 3: Discovering the Status of Your Surname Lineage 301 Data Sources for Figures and Tables 319 References 333 Index 349
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent empirical evidence shows that differences in economic status across families persist over many generations.
“Yet, recent empirical evidence shows that differences in economic status across families instead persist over many generations (e.g., Clark 2014, Lindahl et al. 2015).”
From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Clark 2014
Educational inequality is surprisingly persistent across multiple generations.
“The second finding is that educational inequality is surprisingly persistent across multiple generations.”
From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Clark 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blanden, J., Doepke, M., & Stuhler, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29979 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Biogeographic Ancestry, Cognitive Ability and Socioeconomic Outcomes
Kirkegaard, E., Woodley of Menie, M., Williams, R., Fuerst, J., & Meisenberg, G. (2019) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych1010001 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Wai, J., & Lincoln, D. (2016) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.11.002 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clark, G.
- Corresponding author
- Gregory Clark
- ORCID
- Gregory Clark
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2014-07-16
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 51-7043-51-7043
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1799296864
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Keywords
- social mobility, surnames, surname frequency, family lineage, social stratification, caste, endogamy, upward mobility, downward mobility, social inequality, mobility rate, social homogeneity, ruling class, underclass
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review