Cited by 452Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesHistorical Economic and Social StudiesSocial and Cultural Dynamics

The son also rises: surnames and the history of social mobility

Gregory Clark·2014·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Preface ix 1 Introduction: Of Ruling Classes and Underclasses: The Laws of Social Mobility 1 PART I Social Mobility by Time and Place 2 Sweden: Mobility Achieved? 19 3 The United States: Land of Opportunity 45 4 Medieval England: Mobility in the Feudal Age 70 5 Modern England: The Deep Roots of the Present 88 6 A Law of Social Mobility 107 7 Nature versus Nurture 126 PART II Testing the Laws of Mobility 8 India: Caste, Endogamy, and Mobility 143 9 China and Taiwan: Mobility after Mao 167 10 Japan and Korea: Social Homogeneity and Mobility 182 11 Chile: Mobility among the Oligarchs 199 12 The Law of Social Mobility and Family Dynamics 212 13 Protestants, Jews, Gypsies, Muslims, and Copts: Exceptions to the Law of Mobility? 228 14 Mobility Anomalies 253 PART III The Good Society 15 Is Mobility Too Low? Mobility versus Inequality 261 16 Escaping Downward Social Mobility 279 Appendix 1: Measuring Social Mobility 287 Appendix 2: Deriving Mobility Rates from Surname Frequencies 296 Appendix 3: Discovering the Status of Your Surname Lineage 301 Data Sources for Figures and Tables 319 References 333 Index 349

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.51-7043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent empirical evidence shows that differences in economic status across families persist over many generations.

    “Yet, recent empirical evidence shows that differences in economic status across families instead persist over many generations (e.g., Clark 2014, Lindahl et al. 2015).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Clark 2014

  • Educational inequality is surprisingly persistent across multiple generations.

    “The second finding is that educational inequality is surprisingly persistent across multiple generations.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Clark 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, G.
Corresponding author
Gregory Clark
Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2014-07-16
Volume
51
Issue
12
Pages
51-7043-51-7043
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1799296864
Cited by
452
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
Keywords
social mobility, surnames, surname frequency, family lineage, social stratification, caste, endogamy, upward mobility, downward mobility, social inequality, mobility rate, social homogeneity, ruling class, underclass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review