The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
Abstract
Nennius [Ninnius, Nemniuus] (fl. c. 770–c. 810), scholar, is commonly, but most certainly incorrectly, regarded as the author of the early ninth-century Cambro-Latin historical compilation Historia Brittonum. The ascription to Nennius occurs in just one of the numerous recensions of the text, the so-called ‘Nennian recension’, which survives in five medieval manuscripts. The earliest and primary recension (the Harleian) offers no identity for the author, while most others attribute the text, equally erroneously, to Gildas. No original copy of the Nennian recension survives, but between 1164 and 1166, at the Cistercian abbey of Sawley, Yorkshire, three different scribes collated the same (now lost) copy of the recension with the Gildasian recension which is now in Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, manuscript 139. The Nennian material was accordingly added to this manuscript as a series of interlinear and marginal annotations plus the prologue and this composite text is the archetype of all other copies of this recension. The Nennian recension seems to have been created in north Wales (possibly Anglesey) in the first half of the eleventh century, probably by a scribe called Euben (Owain) under the direction of his clerical magister, Beulan; and it was probably at this stage that the prologue attributing the Historia to Nennius was composed. This prologue describes him as (Ninnius Eluodugi discipulus (‘Ninnius disciple of Elfoddw’)). If Elfoddw is the bishop of Bangor of that name who in 768 was responsible for bringing the Welsh church into conformity in the Paschal question and who died in 809, and assuming the connection with Ninnius is reliable, then Nennius would have lived at some time between about 770 and 810. Furthermore, Nennius may be identified with the Nemniuus said to have composed an alphabet based on Old English runic ‘futhorc’, but adapted to Old Welsh orthography, which is preserved in a manscript written in 817. This would suggest that the historical Nennius was a Welsh scholar with linguistic interests and specifically with a familiarity with things English, perhaps explaining in part why the creators of the Nennian recension believed him to have been the author of the Historia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kirkwood, T. B. L. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0379 · Cited by 608
Yoga in Britain: Stretching Spirituality and Educating Yogis
Newcombe, S. (2019) · doi:10.1558/isbn.9781781796597 · Cited by 27
Henry VII's book of astrology and the Tudor Renaissance
Carey, H. M. (2012) · Renaissance Quarterly · doi:10.1086/668299 · Cited by 21
Moran, L. J. (2018) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s174455231800023x · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2014-08-20
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 52-0005-52-0005
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1607896740
- Cited by
- 935
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.52-0005
- The paper
- Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. (2014). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.52-0005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.