Cited by 135Historical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisEconomic Development and Digital TransformationSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis

Making the Modern World: Materials and Dematerialization

·2014·Choice Reviews Online

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.52-0868

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The production of many basic commodities and commonly used materials such as steel, plastic, and cement is highly carbon intensive.

    “The production of many basic commodities and of the most commonly used materials in industrialized societies, such as steel, plastic, and cement, is highly carbon intensive (3).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 135

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2014-09-22
Volume
52
Issue
02
Pages
52-0868-52-0868
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W565882896
Cited by
135
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Development and Digital Transformation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Keywords
materials, dematerialization, modernity, material culture, industrialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review