Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 62Library Science and InformationLibrary Science and Information LiteracyLibrary Science and Administration

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Attitudes of Presidents and Provosts on the University Library

Open access

Abstract

This study replicates an investigation conducted by Deborah Grimes in 1992–1993 and published in her 1998 book, Academic Library Centrality. This paper reports the results of interviews conducted in 2004 with the presidents and provosts of six universities and compares them with Grimes’ findings. The analysis shows that major changes have occurred in the attitudes of university leaders toward their libraries during the last decade. These new findings provide direction for library leaders as they seek out new models of library service and reshape old models to fit the current environment of American higher education. The findings also point to the emergence of new competencies, skills, and knowledge as essential components of the job of the library director. The results of this study call into question the applicability of the centrality concept to libraries in universities and indicate the need for research that offers a relevant model for use in those settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/crl.68.3.213

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 62

Metadata

Authors
Lynch, B. P., Murray-Rust, C., Parker, S. E., Turner, D., Walker, D. P., Wilkinson, F. C., & Zimmerman, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Ohio University (US)
Venue
College & Research Libraries
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
213-228
ISSN
  • 0010-0870 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6701
OpenAlex
W2037846504
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
College & Research Libraries (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Ohio State University
  • Harvard University
  • Rice University
  • University of Virginia
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
Keywords
academic libraries, university presidents, provost, library leadership, library directors, library service models, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitudes of Presidents and Provosts on the University Library. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/crl.68.3.213
The paper
Lynch, B. P., Murray-Rust, C., Parker, S. E., Turner, D., Walker, D. P., Wilkinson, F. C., & Zimmerman, J. (2007). Attitudes of Presidents and Provosts on the University Library. College & Research Libraries. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.3.213

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.