Cited by 25Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesWeb and Library ServicesInformation Architecture and Usability

“Without That Detail, I’m Not Coming”: The Perspectives of Students with Disabilities on Accessibility Information Provided on Academic Library Websites

Open access
Brunskill, Amelia·2020·College & Research Libraries

Abstract

Although most academic library websites include a webpage of information intended for users with disabilities, no research was located that solicited feedback about users’ needs or preferences for these pages. To address this discrepancy, 12 university students with disabilities were interviewed about their perspectives on navigation, search terms, organization, desired content, and the overall look and feel for such a webpage. These interviews revealed numerous important considerations around accessibility and inclusivity, and a list of recommendations was compiled.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/crl.81.5.768

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brunskill's (2020) and Mulliken's (2019) findings show that user perspectives reveal needs and barriers that are not visible in technical scans.

    “Brunskill's (2020) and Mulliken's (2019) findings show that user perspectives reveal needs and barriers that are not visible in technical scans.”

    From From Compliance to Inclusion (2026) · cites this paper as Brunskill's (2020)

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says each student brought up distinct issues, and reports needs that challenged library employees’ assumptions. The Introduction (page unavailable) notes that earlier examinations of accessibility webpages did not consult users with disabilities. Brunskill does not compare interview findings with technical scans or establish that those scans could not reveal the same barriers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Brunskill's (2020) study suggests that users want practical, navigable information about accessibility resources.

    “Brunskill's (2020) study suggests that users want practical, navigable information about accessibility resources, while Mulliken's (2019) work emphasises efficiency and predictability in web navigation.”

    From From Compliance to Inclusion (2026) · cites this paper as Brunskill's (2020)

  • Brunskill (2020) found that students with disabilities value clear navigation, predictable labeling, and practical information presented in ways that reduce the need for disclosure.

    “Brunskill (2020) addressed this gap by interviewing 12 university students with disabilities about their needs and preferences for academic library accessibility webpages.The study highlights that students value clear navigation, predictable labeling, and practical information presented in ways that reduce the need for disclosure.”

    From From Compliance to Inclusion (2026) · cites this paper as Brunskill (2020)

  • Studies of library websites and accessibility pages demonstrate that technical issues, communication practices, and organisational assumptions all shape access.

    “Studies of library websites and accessibility pages (Liu et al., 2024;Ezell et al., 2021;Brunskill, 2020) demonstrate that technical issues, communication practices, and organisational assumptions all shape access.”

    From From Compliance to Inclusion (2026) · cites this paper as Brunskill, 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Arif Khan, Haroon Idrees, and Khan Mudassir, "Library Web Sites for People with Disability: Accessibility Evaluation of Library Websites in Pakistan," Library Hi Tech News 32, no. 6 (2015): 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2015-0010; · DOI
  2. Erica B. Lilly and Connie Jean Van Fleet, "Wired but Not Connected: Accessibility of Academic Library Home Pages," Refer- ence Librarian 32, no. 67/68 (1999): 5-28;
  3. Lisa Billingham, "Improving Academic Library Website Accessibility for People with Disabilities," Library Management 35, no. 8 (2014): 565-81, https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-11-2013-0107; · DOI
  4. Margaret Brown-Sica, "Conducting Web Usability Testing with Students with Disabilities," Colorado Libraries 33, no. 4 (2007): 16-19.no.
  5. Stephanie J. Graves and Elizabeth German, "Evidence of Our Values: Disability Inclusion on Library Instruction Websites," portal: Libraries and the Academy 18, no. 3 (2018): 559-74;
  6. Rebecca Power and Chris LeBeau, "How Well Do Academic Library Web Sites Address the Needs of Database Users with Visual Disabilities?" Reference Librarian 50, no. 1 (2009): 55-72;
  7. Mary Cassner, Charlene Maxey-Harris, and Toni Anaya, "Differently Able: A Review of Academic Library Websites for People with Disabilities," Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 30, no. 1 (2011): 33-51, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2011.548722. · DOI
  8. Joanne Oud, "Systemic Workplace Barriers for Academic Librarians with Disabilities," College & Research Libraries 80, no. 2 (2019): 169-94.
  9. Sue Samson, "Best Practices for Serving Students with Disabilities," Reference Services Review 39, no. 2 (2011): 260-77.
  10. Lucy Barnar-Brak, DeAnn Lectenberger, and William Y. Lan, "Accommodation Strategies of College Students with Disabilities," The Qualitative Report 15, no. 2 (2010): 411-29.
  11. Annie Venville et al., "Supporting Students with Invisible Disabilities: A Scoping Review of Postsecond- ary Education for Students with Mental Illness or an Acquired Brain Injury," International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 63, no. 6 (2016): 571-92.
  12. Laura Mullins and Michèle Preyde, "The Lived Experience of Students with an Invisible Disability at a July 2020 Canadian University," Disability & Society 28, no. 2 (2013): 147-60.
  13. Cassner, Maxey-Harris, and Anaya, "Differently Able." 14. Graves and German, "Evidence of Our Values." 15. Cassner, Maxey-Harris, and Anaya, "Differently Able." 16. Power and LeBeau, "How Well Do Academic Library Web Sites Address the Needs of Database Users with Visual Disabilities?" 17. Power and LeBeau, "How Well Do Academic Library Web Sites Address the Needs of Database Users with Visual Disabilities?" 18. Cassner, Maxey-Harris, and Anaya, "Differently Able." 19. Adina Mulliken, "'There Is Nothing Inherently Mysterious about Assistive Technology': A Qualitative Study about Blind User Experiences in US Academic Libraries," Reference & User Services Quarterly 57, no. 2 (2017);
  14. Cassner, Maxey-Harris, and Anaya, "Differently Able;" J.J. Pionke, "Toward Holistic Accessibility: Narratives from Func- tionally Diverse Patrons," Reference & User Services Quarterly 57, no. 1 (2017): 48-56;
  15. Wondwossen M. Beyene, "Digital Inclusion in Library Context: A Perspective from Users with Print Disability," Journal of Web Librarianship 12, no. 2 (2018): 121-40;
  16. Kyunghye Yoon et al., "An Exploratory Study of Library Website Accessibility for Visually Impaired Users," Library & Information Science Research 38, no. 3 (2016): 250-58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.08.006; · DOI
  17. Nihal Menzi-Cetin et al., "Evaluation of a University Website's Usability for Visually Impaired Students," Universal Access in the Information Society 16, no. 1 (2017): 151-60.
  18. Mulliken, "There Is Nothing Inherently Mysterious about Assistive Technology"; Adina Mulliken, "Eighteen Blind Library Users' Experiences with Library Websites and Search Tools in US Academic Libraries: A Qualitative Study," College & Research Libraries 80, no. 2 (2018): 152-68;
  19. Clayton A. Copeland, "Library and Information Center Accessibility: The Differently-Able Patron's Per- spective," Technical Services Quarterly 28, no. 2 (2011): 223-41, https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2011.546281. · DOI
  20. Heather Hill, "Disability and Accessibility in the Library and Information Science Literature: A Content Analysis," Library & Information Science Research 35, no. 2 (2013): 137-42.
  21. James Cho, "Building Bridges: Librarians and Autism Spectrum Disorder," Reference Services Review 46, no. 3 (2018): 325-39.
  22. Wondwossen Mulualem Beyene, "Resource Discovery and Universal Access: Understanding Enablers and Barriers from the User Perspective," in Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2016/08/19, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 229 (IOP Press, 2016), 556-66.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brunskill, A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Brunskill, Amelia
Venue
College & Research Libraries
Published
2020
Pages
768
ISSN
  • 0010-0870 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6701
OpenAlex
W3040266725
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • College & Research Libraries (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • University of Illinois Chicago
Funders
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Architecture and Usability
Keywords
accessibility, students with disabilities, university library websites, user perspective, web navigation, search terms, web design, inclusivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review