The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the Minimum: New Rule Requires Web Content (I’m Looking at You, LibGuides) to Meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA Standards
Open accessAbstract
In April 2024, the Department of Justice finalized a rule updating regulations for Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which requires that all state and local governments make their services, programs, and activities accessible, including those that are offered online and in mobile apps. The final rule dictates that public entities’ web content meet the technical standards of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Version 2.1, level AA, an industry standard since its creation in 2018. Libraries that receive federal funding will be required to follow this rule for any web content they create, including LibGuides. Springshare’s LibGuide platform is one of the most widely used among libraries for web content creation, from complete websites to pedagogical and research guides. While Springshare may develop plans to make sure its clients are in compliance with this new rule, there are more important questions that LibGuide creators need to consider to move beyond the bare minimum of following the rule. The authors explain what WCAG 2.1 AA compliance requires, how LibGuide authors can use accessibility principles to ensure compliance, and offer available tools to check existing guides, as well as discuss alternatives to LibGuides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This aligns with the requirements for U.S. digital accessibility which is shaped by the ADA, Sect.504, and Sect.508 of the Rehabilitation Act for institution to comply with WCAG 2.1 AA standards [1,9].”
From Toward universal access to information: an analysis of digital accessibility policy readiness in U.S. public universities (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Lechtenberg, Urszula and Helene Gold. LOEX 2022: When All You Have Is a Hammer, Everything Looks like a LibGuide: Strengths, Limitations, and Opportunities of the Teaching Tool. Conference presentation recording, 2022. https://vimeo.com/721358576.
- Melina Sherman, "Accessibility in Libraries: A Landscape Review," n.d., p. 10. 2 Sherman, "Accessibility in Libraries, p. 12.
Cited by
Cudjoe, E. K., & Asilevi, P. A. (2026) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-026-01379-8
Okamoto, K. (2026) · Journal of Access Services · doi:10.1080/15367967.2026.2646147
Cudjoe, E. K., Asilevi, P. A., Dahunsi, O., & Adams, M. (2026) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2026.103293
Campbell, S., Atkinson, E., Lanius, A., & Capdarest‐Arest, N. (2026) · Internet Reference Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10875301.2026.2700711
Metadata
- Authors
- Lechtenberg, U., & Gold, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Venue
- Information Technology and Libraries
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2024-12-16
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0730-9295 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5226
- OpenAlex
- W4405460388
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Information Technology and Libraries (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Information Technology and Libraries (Boston College) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, Springshare, web accessibility, library websites, accessibility compliance, accessibility tools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
