Cited by 22Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEducational Assessment and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Manifestation of critical thinking skills in the English textbooks employed by language institutes in Iran

Open access
Birjandi, Parviz, Alizadeh, Iman·2012·International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning

Abstract

Scholars in the field of education have unanimously subscribed to the pivotal role of critical thinking in individuals' life in general and their academic life in particular (Bloom, 1956;Ennis, 2003;Dewey, 1933).The thrust of the current study was to investigate the extent to which the books employed for Teaching English as Foreign Language include critical thinking skills.To attain this goal, 3 series of English books, namely, Top notch, Interchange, and English files series utilized by language institutes in Iran were targeted.Next, a seventy two-item critical thinking checklist based on Likert-scale and consisting of twelve skills; namely, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, deduction, induction, balanced-thinking, multiple perspective-taking, creative thinking, building community of thinkers, and knowledge was developed.The target skills on the checklist were mainly based on Bloom's taxonomy and the related literature on critical thinking.The checklist was validated by the researchers themselves and some experts in the field and the reliability coefficient was also estimated at 0.86.Then, two raters conducted a content analysis on the books and determined the magnitude of each skill.The data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis Non-parametric tests).Findings of the study revealed that the books mainly tapped knowledge, comprehension, application and building community of thinkers skills and failed to acceptably include other skills reported to be of utmost importance for students' academic success.The comparison of the mean rank of the skills in the three books also disclosed that as for lower order thinking skills there wasn't a significant difference among the books; however, as for other skills Top notch was marginally higher.The paper also discusses the lack of critical thinking in the classroom and materials and proposes some ways to include more critical thinking skills in the materials.The results of the study have significant implications for material developers, educational policy makers and teachers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5861/ijrsll.2012.100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bloom, 1956, Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain.
  2. Browne, 2007, Asking the right questions: to critical thinking.
  3. Clarke, 1990, Stereotyping in TESOL materials.
  4. Cunningsworth, 1995, Choosing your course-book.
  5. Dewey, 1933, How we think.
  6. Epstein, 2006, Critical thinking.
  7. Grey, 2000, The ELT Course book as Cultural Artifact., ELT J., 54, 78
  8. Harmer, 1996, The practice of English language teaching.
  9. Haycroft, 1998, An introduction to English language teaching.
  10. Halpern, 2003, Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking
  11. Lipman, 1984, The cultivation of reasoning through philosophy., Educ. Leadersh., 42, 51
  12. Paul, 2006, Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life
  13. Phillipson, 1992, Linguistic imperialism.
  14. Porecca, 1984, Sexism in current ESL textbooks., TESOL Q., 18, 70
  15. Renner, 1997, Women are busy, tall, and beautiful: Looking at sexism in EFL materials.
  16. Riazi, 2007, Lexis in English textbooks in Iran: Analysis of exercises and proposals for consciousness-raising activities., Pacific Association of Applied Linguists, 11, 17

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Birjandi, P., & Alizadeh, I.
Venue
International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning
Published
2012-06-02
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2243-7754 (ISSN-L)
  • 2243-7762
OpenAlex
W2053935329
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
10.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Keywords
critical thinking skills, English textbooks, English as a foreign language, textbook analysis, interchanges, English File, Bloom's taxonomy, language institutes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review