Online Journaling: The Informal Writings of Two Adolescent Girls
Abstract
One under–researched writing practice of today’s millennial youth is online journaling. Despite the plethora of online journals on the Internet and their ubiquitous use by adolescents, little research has been conducted on online journaling as a literacy practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of qualitative studies did not address the relationship between researchers and participants, except for two.
“The majority of the studies did not address the relationship between researchers and participants, except for two (Chittenden, 2010; Guzzetti & Gamboa, 2005).”
From A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development (2025) · cites this paper as Guzzetti & Gamboa, 2005
Three qualitative studies found that those who got feedback from their audience reinforced their self-concept clarity.
“Three qualitative studies found that those who got feedback from their audience reinforced their self-concept clarity (Bell, 2019; Guzzetti & Gamboa, 2005; Subrahmanyam et al., 2009).”
From A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development (2025) · cites this paper as Guzzetti & Gamboa, 2005
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process
Agee, J. (2009) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518390902736512 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development
Avci, H., Baams, L., & Kretschmer, T. (2025) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-024-00251-1 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
“Three qualita - tive studies found that those who got feedback from their audience reinforced their self-concept clarity (Bell, 2019; Guzzetti & Gamboa, 2005; Subrahmanyam et al., 2009 ).”
- Authors
- Guzzetti, B., & Gamboa, M.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Research in the Teaching of English
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-206
- ISSN
- 0034-527X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2348
- OpenAlex
- W76277257
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 96.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in the Teaching of English (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Keywords
- online journaling, adolescent girls, informal writing, literacy practices, millennials, digital writing, electronic journals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
