The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Composing Processes of Unskilled College Writers
Abstract
Preview this article: The Composing Processes of Unskilled College Writers, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/rte/13/4/researchintheteachingofenglish17867-1.gif
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040003685 · Cited by 812
The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers
Hyland, F. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90017-0 · Cited by 456
Writing for Readers: Three Perspectives on Audience
Kroll, B. (1984) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/358094 · Cited by 91
(1988) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Perl, S.
- Venue
- Research in the Teaching of English
- Published
- 1979-12-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-336
- ISSN
- 0034-527X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2348
- OpenAlex
- W1486109976
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
