The Northern Kingdom in the Late Tenth-Ninth Centuries bce
Abstract
A major problem in the discussion of the kingdom of Israel in the late tenth–ninth centuries is the evaluation of the Books of Kings as a source for historical reconstruction. In addition to Kings, there are some late tenth–ninth century Egyptian, Assyrian, Aramaic, and Moabite royal inscriptions that refer to various events in the history of the kingdom. However, the number and scope of these inscriptions are limited, and on their basis plus the archaeological data alone we would be unable to draw even a schematic history. The reconstruction of the early history of the Northern Kingdom must begin by tackling a major problem: that of the historicity of the United Monarchy. From the reigns of Jeroboam and Rehoboam on, the years of each king in the kingdoms of Israel and Judah are accurately enumerated. In addition to the above, this chapter also looks at the early dynasties of the Northern Kingdom, including that of the Omrides, and Jehu's rebellion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No destruction layer has been securely tied to Shoshenq I's campaign, despite many southern Levantine sites being mentioned on the list.
“Although many sites in the southern Levant are mentioned on the list, no destruction layer has been securely tied to this event, leading some scholars to suggest that the campaign did not include any destructions (Na'aman 1998(Na'aman , 2007)).”
From Pre‐Excavation Identification and Dating of Iron Age Destruction Events (2025) · cites this paper as Na'aman 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pre‐Excavation Identification and Dating of Iron Age Destruction Events
Vaknin, Y., Granot, R., Shalom, N., Buzaglo‐Yoresh, E., Keidar‐Goldberg, A., & Münger, S. (2025) · Archaeological Prospection · doi:10.1002/arp.70003 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Although many sites in the southern Levant are mentioned on the list, no destruction layer has been securely tied to this event, leading some scholars to suggest that the campaign did not include any destructions (Na'aman 1998, 2007).”
- Authors
- NA’AMAN, N.
- Corresponding author
- NA’AMAN, NADAV
- ORCID
- NA’AMAN, NADAV
- Venue
- Understanding the History of Ancient Israel
- Publisher
- British Academy
- Published
- 2007-10-25
- OpenAlex
- W2487670863
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Academy eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Keywords
- Northern Kingdom of Israel, Books of Kings, Jeroboam, Rehoboam, Assyrian royal inscriptions, Aramaic inscriptions, Moabite inscriptions, ancient Israelite history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review