The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bronze Age Travellers
Abstract
This paper reconstructs the geographical and social horizons of some typical Bronze Age travellers and wanderers, the institutions that supported them, and distances covered. From this, we may deduce that they travelled along well-trodden paths in familiar landscapes and with familiar destinations of social peers along the route. The same was true of maritime journeys, where destinations were marked by coastal cairns along the route and safe natural harbours for resting. In their vicinity, we often find rock art panels whose motifs point to ceremonies when meeting your peers and celebrating guest-friendship. These peers all belonged to the chiefly elites of free farmers, whether warriors, traders, craft specialists, learned persons, whether male or female, children, teenagers, or grown-ups.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, this applies to the northern part of the study area, which had active connections with northwestern and central Europe (Kristiansen 2022), forming a trans-Mediterranean and European network stretching from the British Isles and Scandinavia to the Levant, the Near East, and West Africa.”
From Modelling land and water based movement corridors in the western Mediterranean: a least cost path analysis from chalcolithic and early bronze age ivory records (2024) · cites this paper as Kristiansen 2022
Citations
Cited by
Bilotti, G., Kempf, M., & Morillo Leon, J. M. (2024) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-024-02029-x · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Kristiansen, K.
- Venue
- Rethinking Migrations in Late Prehistoric Eurasia
- Publisher
- British Academy
- Published
- 2022-12-22
- Pages
- 89-109
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
