The National and State Tobacco Control Program: Overview of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Efforts to Address Commercial Tobacco Use
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The near ubiquity of nicotine screening is likely due to campaigns, awareness of quitline resources, and educational efforts.
“The near ubiquity of nicotine screening is likely a result of campaigns, awareness of quitline resources where patients can easily be referred, and educational efforts amongst dental professionals that highlight the direct relevance to oral health and promote easy to implement screening programs, such as the 5-As (Gajendra et al., 2023; Marshall et al., 2024).”
From Dental screening, counseling, and referral to treatment for substance use disorder: Survey of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (2026) · cites this paper as Marshall et al., 2024
The National and State Tobacco Control Program section (page not provided) links education, media campaigns, and health-system changes to quitline use and tobacco screening and referrals. It does not establish that nicotine screening is nearly ubiquitous or that these efforts caused its prevalence among dental professionals; it also does not address oral-health education or the 5-As. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- [1]US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking — 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention; 2014. Accessed August 15, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK179276/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK179276.pdf
- [2]Cornelius ME, Loretan CG, Jamal A, Davis Lynn BC, Mayer M, Alcantara IC,. Tobacco product use among adults — United States, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023; 72(18): 475– 483. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7218a1 37141154 PMC10168602 · DOI · Paper page
- [4]Xu X, Shrestha SS, Trivers KF, Neff L, Armour BS, King BA. U.S. healthcare spending attributable to cigarette smoking in 2014. Prev Med. 2021; 150: 106529. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106529 33771566 PMC10953804 · DOI
- [5]Cornelius ME, Loretan CG, Wang TW, Jamal A, Homa DM. Tobacco product use among adults — United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022; 71(11): 397– 405. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7111a1 35298455 PMC8942309 · DOI · Paper page
- [6]Yerger VB, Przewoznik J, Malone RE. Racialized geography, corporate activity, and health disparities: tobacco industry targeting of inner cities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007; 18(4 Suppl): 10– 38. 10.1353/hpu.2007.0120 18065850 · DOI
- [7]Tsai J, Homa DM, Neff LJ, Sosnoff CS, Wang L, Blount BC,. Trends in secondhand smoke exposure, 2011–2018: impact and implications of expanding serum cotinine range. Am J Prev Med. 2021; 61(3): e109– e117. 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.04.004 34419235 · DOI
- [8]Buchting FO, Emory KT, Scout, Kim Y, Fagan P, Vera LE,. Transgender use of cigarettes, cigars, and e-cigarettes in a national study. Am J Prev Med. 2017; 53(1): e1– e7. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.022 28094133 PMC5478444 · DOI
- [9]Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: detailed tables. September 11, 2020. Accessed October 30, 2023. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2019-nsduh-detailed-tables 39437027
- [12]Maciosek MV, St Claire AW, Keller PA, LaFrance AB, Xu Z, Schillo B. Projecting the future impact of past accomplishments in tobacco control. Tob Control. 2021; 30(2): 231– 233. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055487 32193213 · DOI
- [13]Bauer UE, Johnson TM, Hopkins RS, Brooks RG. Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998–2000. JAMA. 2000; 284(6): 723– 728. 10.1001/jama.284.6.723 10927781 · DOI
- [14]Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority. Federal Register 43:9773. [4110-85] (March 10, 1978) p. 9868. 10557595
- [21]Murphy-Hoefer R, Davis KC, King BA, Beistle D, Rodes R, Graffunder C. Association between the Tips From Former Smokers Campaign and smoking cessation among adults, United States, 2012–2018. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020; 17: E97. 10.5888/pcd17.200052 32857030 PMC7478162 · DOI
- [25]Zaza S, Briss PA, Harris KW. The Guide to Community Preventive Services: What Works to Promote Health? Oxford University Press; 2005.
- [26]Institute of Medicine. Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. The National Academies Press; 2007.
- [28]McAfee T, Davis KC, Alexander RL Jr, Pechacek TF, Bunnell R. Effect of the first federally funded US antismoking national media campaign. Lancet. 2013; 382(9909): 2003– 2011. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61686-4 24029166 · DOI
- [29]Glover-Kudon RM, Gates EF. The role of quitlines in tobacco cessation: an introduction. Am J Prev Med. 2021; 60(3 Suppl 2): S99– S102. 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.003 33663707 · DOI
- [30]Rigotti NA. Integrating comprehensive tobacco treatment into the evolving US health care system: it’s time to act: comment on “A randomized trial of internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation”. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(1): 53– 55. 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.491 21220661 · DOI
- [31]Farrelly MC. Monitoring the tobacco use epidemic V: the environment: factors that influence tobacco use. Prev Med. 2009; 48(1 Suppl): S35– S43. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.012 19022281 · DOI
- [32]Lavinghouze SR, Snyder K, Rieker PP. The component model of infrastructure: a practical approach to understanding public health program infrastructure. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104(8): e14– e24. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302033 24922125 PMC4103204 · DOI
- [33]Berg CJ. Quitline reach and effectiveness among populations disproportionately affected by tobacco use: future directions. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021; 32(3): 1188– 1198. 10.1353/hpu.2021.0125 34421024 · DOI
- [37]Villanti AC, Mowery PD, Delnevo CD, Niaura RS, Abrams DB, Giovino GA. Changes in the prevalence and correlates of menthol cigarette use in the USA, 2004-2014. Tob Control. 2016; 25(Suppl 2): ii14– ii20. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053329 27729565 · DOI
- [38]Lawrence D, Rose A, Fagan P, Moolchan ET, Gibson JT, Backinger CL. National patterns and correlates of mentholated cigarette use in the United States. Addiction. 2010; 105(S uppl 1): 13– 31. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03203.x 21059133 · DOI
- [39]Fallin A, Goodin AJ, King BA. Menthol cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 48(1): 93– 97. 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.044 25245795 PMC4454462 · DOI
- [40]Young-Wolff KC, Hickman NJ III, Kim R, Gali K, Prochaska JJ. Correlates and prevalence of menthol cigarette use among adults with serious mental illness. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 17(3): 285– 291. 10.1093/ntr/ntu141 25190706 PMC4342677 · DOI
- [42]Ahmed SM, Palermo AG. Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(8): 1380– 1387. 10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137 20558798 PMC2901283 · DOI · Paper page
- [51]Gibbs DA, Hawkins SR, Clinton-Sherrod AM, Noonan RK. Empowering programs with evaluation technical assistance: outcomes and lessons learned. Health Promot Pract. 2009; 10(1 S uppl): 38S– 44S. 10.1177/1524839908316517 19136444 · DOI
- [52]Roeseler A, Hagaman T, Kurtz C. The use of training and technical assistance to drive and improve performance of California’s Tobacco Control Program. Health Promot Pract. 2011; 12(6 Suppl 2): 130S– 143S. 10.1177/1524839911419297 22068576 · DOI
- [53]Treiber J, Cassady D, Kipke R, Kwon N, Satterlund T. Building the evaluation capacity of California’s local tobacco control programs. Health Promot Pract. 2011; 12(6 Suppl 2): 118S– 124S. 10.1177/1524839911414411 22068574 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McCauley, J. L., Crawford, P., Leo, M. C., McBurnie, M. A., Barton, D., Weidner, H. A., Rindal, D. B., & the National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group (2026) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.24-00383 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marshall, L., Pasalic, E., Mahoney, M., Turner, T., Sneegas, K., & Kittner, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marshall, LaTisha
- Venue
- Preventing Chronic Disease
- Published
- 2024-05-30
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- E38-E38
- ISSN
- 1545-1151 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11155683
- OpenAlex
- W4399173469
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Preventing Chronic Disease (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- tobacco control, chronic disease prevention, tobacco use prevention
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Tobacco Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Humans, United States, Tobacco Products, Tobacco Use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review