Cited by 0Byzantine Studies and HistoryBiblical Studies and InterpretationHistorical and Linguistic Studies

A New Coptic Anaphora Fragment with Quotations from Didache 9 (London, British Library, Or. 6877)

Open access
T. Mihálykó, Ágnes·2025·Eastern Theological Jornal

Abstract

This article presents the first edition of an otherwise unknown, fragmentary Sahidic anaphora with translation, philological, and liturgical commentary. The manuscript, London, British Library, Or. 6877, described and partially transcribed by Bentley Layton in 1987, consists of two parchment double leaves and can be dated to the sixth or seventh centuries on palaeographical grounds. The extant text consists of the last two fruits of communion and the doxology of an anaphora, followed by Didache 9,3, 9,4, and 9,2 (the ‘bread’, ‘gathering’, and ‘chalice’ prayers), and an intercession for the deceased, which breaks off in the middle. The fruits of communion and the doxology bear close resemblance to the so-called ‘anaphora of Barcelona’. The quotes from Didache are near verbatim, even the doxologies of the prayers are kept. The intercession derives from a so-called ‘independent intercession’ of the oratio universalis. The anaphora is thus a veritable bricolage: to the end of an anaphora a compiler appended the prayers from the Didache 9 and an intercession. His purpose must have been to update an older formulary with units he considered essential in order to bring it in conformity with the usage of his place and time. As I argue, this compilation can be dated to the fourth or fifth centuries. This fragment is therefore a further witness to redactional activity on anaphoras in that period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.59241/etj.11.2.271-303

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
T. Mihálykó, Á.
Venue
Eastern Theological Jornal
Published
2025
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
271-303
ISSN
  • 2416-2213 (ISSN-L)
  • 3094-3167
OpenAlex
W7129109644
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Eastern Theological Jornal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Austrian Science Fund (ESP 7862124)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Byzantine Studies and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and Linguistic Studies
Keywords
Sahidic Coptic, doxology, early Christian liturgy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review