Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chasing Aces: Asexuality, Misinformation and the Challenges of Identity

Colborne, Adrienne·2018·Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management

Abstract

Asexuality is a deeply misunderstood and little-known sexual orientation. This is partly due to misconceptions and marginalization of asexual people, and partly by a lack of information about the orientation. This paper outlines the misconceptions of the ‘causes’ of asexuality, namely Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD), abuse, and religious abstinence. These causes are shown to be invalid due to the key element of self-identification in determining an orientation.; nevertheless, they persist in society because little is known about the nature of asexuality. The facets of the asexual orientation are then discussed: levels of sexual attraction, sexual desire, and romantic orientation, displaying the complex attempt to define asexuality, made even more difficult by a lack of sources concerning these facets.. Finally, the tension between the LGBTQ+ community and asexuals is discussed in terms of the debate about including asexuals in this community, with the groups often speaking at cross-purposes. It becomes clear that being asexual requires a complex navigation of territory, and this problem is exacerbated at every step by a lack of information. It is therefore crucial that this informational gap is addressed at each of these three critical areas in order to build a more complete societal grasp of asexuality, and to create a vibrant, open community for those who identify as asexual.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5931/djim.v14i0.6926

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bogaert, Anthony F. (2006). Toward a conceptual understanding of asexuality. Review of General Psychology, 10(3).
  2. Brotto, L. A., Yule, M. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2015). Asexuality: an extreme variant of sexual desire disorder? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(3), 646-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12806 · DOI
  3. Canning, Dominique A. (2015). Queering asexuality: Asexual-inclusion in queer spaces. McNair Scholars Research Journal, 8(1), Article 6.
  4. Gressgård, R. (2013). Asexuality: From pathology to identity and beyond. Psychology & Sexuality, 4(2), 179- 192. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899. 2013.774166 · DOI
  5. MacNeela, P., & Murphy, A. (2015). Freedom, invisibility, and community: A qualitative study of self-identification with asexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(3), 799-812.
  6. Miller, S. (2015). A queer literacy framework promoting (a)gender and (a)sexuality self-determination and justice. English Journal, High School Edition, 104(5), 37-44.
  7. Pinto, S. A. (2014). ASEXUally: On being an ally to the asexual community. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 8(4), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538605. 2014.960130 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Colborne, A.
Venue
Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management
Published
2018-04-11
Volume
14
ISSN
1923-6530
Cited by
10
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.