Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Care for both mother and child immediately after childbirth: a descriptive study

Open access
Rodrigues, Dafne Paiva, Dodou, Hilana Dayana, Lago, Pamela Nery do, Mesquita, Nayara Sousa, Melo, Laura Pinto Torres de, Sousa, Albertina Antonielly Sydney de·2014·Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing
DOI 10.5935/1676-4285.20144231
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

"Aim: To understand the perceptions of users about the care provided to them and their newborns immediately after childbirth. Method: This is a descriptive study in which a qualitative approach was used, involving 20 postpartum women admitted to a secondary level Public Hospital of Fortaleza. Semi-structured interviews were carried out and were analyzed by means of Bardin’s content analysis technique. Results: Three categories were highlighted: Care provided to newborns; care (or lack of care) provided to postpartum women; and structural failures of the maternity hospital. Discussion: Postpartum care was primarily focused on guidance on breastfeeding, without considering other demands of women, such as: the need for greater attention by the health team; more humane behavior of some health professionals; and guidance on self-care. Conclusion: Postpartum care is still limited and it requires greater attention and commitment from health professionals, as well as adjustments in the structural and organizational conditions of the maternity hospital so that it may provide decent and humane care."

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5935/1676-4285.20144231

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]20. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. HumanizaSUS. Brasília: Ambiência; 2004. All authors participated in the phases of this publication in one or more of the following steps, in According to the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE, 2013): (a) substantial involvement in the planning or preparation of the manuscript or in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data; (b) preparation of the manuscript or conducting critical revision of intellectual content; (c) approval of the versión submitted of this manuscript. All authors declare for the appropriate purposes that the responsibilities related to all aspects of the manuscript submitted to OBJN are yours. They ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the article were properly investigated and resolved. Therefore, they exempt the OBJN of any participation whatsoever in any imbroglios concerning the content under consideration. All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest of financial or personal nature concerning this manuscript which may influence the writing and/or interpretation of the findings. This statement has been digitally signed by all authors as recommended by the ICMJE, whose model is available in http://www.objnursing.uff.br/normas/DUDE_eng_13-06-2013.pdf Received: 02/27/2013 Revised: 04/29/2014 Approved: 04/29/2014

Cited by

See all 17

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rodrigues, D. P., Dodou, H. D., Lago, P. N. D., Mesquita, N. S., Melo, L. P. T. D., & Sousa, A. A. S. D.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual do Ceará (BR)
ORCID
Venue
Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing
Publisher
GN1 Sistemas e Publicacoes Ltd.
Published
2014
Volume
13
Issue
2
ISSN
1676-4285 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5935/1676-4285.20144231
OpenAlex
W2221336327
Cited by
17
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
postpartum care, neonatal care, immediate postpartum period, patient perspectives, postpartum women, breastfeeding guidance, health professionals' practices, self-care guidance, humanized care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.