The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Land use impact on soil erosion at different scales in the Brazilian semi-arid
Open accessAbstract
Erosion and sediment transport processes are strongly dependent on the spatial scale and land use. The objective of this study is to analyse the effects of slash and burn of vegetation followed by grass cultivation for grazing, on the hydrological and sedimentological behaviour at different spatial scales in a semiarid region in Brazil. Rainfall, runoff and soil loss were measured during three years (total of 116 rainfall-runoff events) at three spatial scales: 1 m² and 20 m² plots and 2.8 ha watershed. During the first year (2009) the native dry tropical forest/Caatinga vegetation was maintained, whereas on the following years (2010 and 2011) the original vegetation was cleared using slash and burn techniques to grow pasture (Andropogon gayanus Kunt). Annual runoff coefficient is highest at the 20 m² plot among the investigated scales. Runoff presented the same trend in all years. Sediment yield was strongly influenced by the land cover. Slash, burn and pasture cultivation strongly impacted sediment yield: the first two events after the land cover change yielded roughly ten times more sediment than similar events in the years with native cover and after grass development. The change was most noticeable at the catchment scale due to erosion along the stream, redefining the drainage network.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One study, for example, found similar runoff responses following prescribed burns but for shorter duration when compared to that of wildfire (dos Santos et al., 2017).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as dos Santos et al., 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., & Leibowitz, S. G. (2022) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2021wr030699 · Cited by 241
“One study, for example, found similar runoff responses following prescribed burns but for shorter duration when compared to that of wildfire (dos Santos et al., 2017).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Santos, J. C. N. D., Andrade, E. M. D., Medeiros, P. H. A., Guerreiro, M. J. S., & Palácio, H. A. D. Q.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará (BR)
- Fernando Pessoa University (PT)
- Venue
- REVISTA CIÊNCIA AGRONÔMICA
- Publisher
- GN1 Genesis Network
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0045-6888 (ISSN-L)
- 1806-6690
- OpenAlex
- W2577405608
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Ciência Agronômica/Revista ciência agronômica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Geography and Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
- Keywords
- soil erosion, land use change, slash-and-burn, pasture, Andropogon gayanus, sediment yield, rainfall-runoff, spatial scale, Caatinga, semi-arid region, catchment hydrology, drainage network
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review