Research Software Alliance Community Report 2023
Open accessAbstract
January 2024 This downloadable report features ReSA's engagement in 2023 with key decision makers and influencers involved with research software across the globe, as well as the broader research software community. Citation: Hartley, Kim & Barker, Michelle (2024). Research Software Alliance Community Report 2023. Zenodo.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BSA | The Software Alliance advocates for policies that reduce regulatory constraints to promote AI adoption.
“The lobbying efforts of influential tech organizations like BSA | The Software Alliance (30)—which represents companies such as OpenAI and Microsoft—advocate for policies that reduce regulatory constraints to promote AI adoption.”
From Why we need to be careful with LLMs in medicine (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why we need to be careful with LLMs in medicine
Bélisle-Pipon, J.-C. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1495582 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
- Authors
- Research Software Alliance
- Publisher
- Front Matter
- Published
- 2024-01-09
- OpenAlex
- W7213314480
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Keywords
- research software, Research Software Alliance, research software community, stakeholder engagement, research software policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
