Cited by 0Conferences and Exhibitions ManagementDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchSport and Mega-Event Impacts

From attendance motives to satisfaction drivers: Extending the push-pull framework in academic conferences

Open access
Bevanda, Nevena, Vrcelj, Nikolina, Bevanda, Vuk·2026·Marketing

Abstract

Academic conferences play a key role in knowledge dissemination, professional development, and international collaboration. While prior research has extensively examined motivational factors influencing conference attendance, crossnational evidence on how these motivations translate into participant satisfaction remains limited. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the impact of key motivational factors on satisfaction among academic conference participants using a multi-country sample of academic conference attendees from 18 different countries. Drawing on the push–pull framework, five motivational dimensions are examined: destination and leisure, academic and professional development, networking, travel convenience, and costs. Data were collected via an online survey, resulting in 127 valid responses, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. The results show that destination and leisure and academic and professional development significantly predict satisfaction, whereas networking, travel convenience, and costs do not. These findings highlight a distinction between attendance motivators and satisfaction drivers and extend the push–pull framework to the post-conference evaluation stage, offering practical implications for conference design and management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5937/mkng2601017b

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47

Authors
Bevanda, N., Vrcelj, N., & Bevanda, V.
Affiliations
  • Udruženje ekonomista i menadžera Balkana
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
Venue
Marketing
Published
2026
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
17-28
ISSN
  • 0354-3471 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-8364
OpenAlex
W7140059927
Cited by
0
References
47
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Marketing (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conferences and Exhibitions Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Keywords
academic conferences, conference attendance, participant satisfaction, push-pull framework, academic and professional development, networking, travel convenience, conference costs, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review