From attendance motives to satisfaction drivers: Extending the push-pull framework in academic conferences
Open accessAbstract
Academic conferences play a key role in knowledge dissemination, professional development, and international collaboration. While prior research has extensively examined motivational factors influencing conference attendance, crossnational evidence on how these motivations translate into participant satisfaction remains limited. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the impact of key motivational factors on satisfaction among academic conference participants using a multi-country sample of academic conference attendees from 18 different countries. Drawing on the push–pull framework, five motivational dimensions are examined: destination and leisure, academic and professional development, networking, travel convenience, and costs. Data were collected via an online survey, resulting in 127 valid responses, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. The results show that destination and leisure and academic and professional development significantly predict satisfaction, whereas networking, travel convenience, and costs do not. These findings highlight a distinction between attendance motivators and satisfaction drivers and extend the push–pull framework to the post-conference evaluation stage, offering practical implications for conference design and management.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47
- Authors
- Bevanda, N., Vrcelj, N., & Bevanda, V.
- Affiliations
- Udruženje ekonomista i menadžera Balkana
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- Venue
- Marketing
- Published
- 2026
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-28
- ISSN
- 0354-3471 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-8364
- OpenAlex
- W7140059927
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Marketing (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conferences and Exhibitions Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
- Keywords
- academic conferences, conference attendance, participant satisfaction, push-pull framework, academic and professional development, networking, travel convenience, conference costs, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review