Cited by 10Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFungal Plant Pathogen ControlPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morphological and molecular identification and fungicide sensitivity assay of pathogens attacking guyabano (Annona muricata) in Philippines

Open access
Alberto, R. T.·2016·Plant Pathology & Quarantine

Abstract

This study characterizes the plant pathogens attacking guyabano fruits and leaves through morphological and molecular approaches and determines their sensitivity to fungicides.Three fungal pathogens were found on guyabano fruit, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, C. acutatum and Fusarium chlamydosporum.Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was also found to infect the leaves.Molecular identification of the Colletotrichum species was carried out through amplification of rDNA ITS regions by using species specific primers: CgInt for C. gloeosporioides and CaInt2 for C. acutatum in combination with ITS4 universal primer.Ver ITS primer was used on Fusarium species.All fungal pathogens were found to be highly pathogenic to guyabano fruits and leaves.Sensitivity assay revealed that all three pathogens were highly susceptible to captan, tebuconazole and difenoconazole + propiconazole.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5943/ppq/6/1/9

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gottsberger G. 1988 -Comments on flower evolution and beetle pollination in the genera Annona and Rollinia. Plant Systematics and Evolution 167(3-4), 189-194.
  2. Nweke CN, Ibiam OFA. 2012 -Pre and post-harvest fungi associated with the soft rot of the fruit of Annona muricata, and their effects on the nutrient content of the pulp. American Journal of Food and Nutrition 2(4), 78-85. Doi 10.5251/ajfn.2012.2.4.78.85 · DOI
  3. Ou SH. 1985 -Rice diseases, 2nd edition. The Cambrian News (Aberystwyth). pp 380.
  4. Sutton BC. 1992 -The genus Glomerella and its anamorph Colletotrichum In: Colletotrichum: biology, pathology and control (Baile JA, Jeger MJ, eds.), CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 26.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Alberto, R. T.
Affiliations
Central Luzon State University (PH)
Corresponding author
Alberto, R. T.
Venue
Plant Pathology & Quarantine
Published
2016-04-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
60-79
ISSN
2229-2217 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2580085390
Cited by
10
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Plant Pathology & Quarantine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Keywords
Annona muricata, plant pathogenic fungi, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Colletotrichum acutatum, Fusarium chlamydosporum, ITS rDNA identification, fungicide sensitivity, captan, tebuconazole, difenoconazole, propiconazole, Philippines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review