Asset-Based Approaches to Equitable Mathematics Education Research and Practice
Abstract
In July 2017, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) released a new mission statement that shifts the organization's primary focus to supporting and advocating for the highest quality mathematics teaching and learning for all students. A key strategy for achieving this goal is to advance “a culture of equity where each and every person has access to high quality teaching and is empowered as a learner and doer of mathematics” (NCTM, 2017, “Strategic Framework,” para. 2). Increasing equity and ensuring the highest quality mathematics teaching and learning for all students requires systemic change (National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics [NCSM] & TODOS: Mathematics for ALL, 2016). As educators are called to enact NCTM's new mission, we acknowledge that such change is complex. We also acknowledge that our own experiences conducting equity work that is grounded in an asset-based approach are at different stages of development, ranging from beginning levels to lived experiences as diverse mathematics learners and mathematics education researchers. We see this change in mission as a call to both act politically (Aguirre et al., 2017) and to change story lines (i.e., “broad, culturally shared narrative[s]”; Herbel-Eisenmann et al., 2016, p. 104) that dominate the public perception of mathematics learning and teaching. We acknowledge that systemic barriers are part of a larger educational issue, but for the purposes of this commentary, we focus on mathematics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CRMT tool provides a culturally responsive approach to teaching mathematics in the classroom.
“and it provides a culturally responsive approach to teaching mathematics in the classroom (Abdulrahim & Orosco, 2020; Bonner, 2021; Celedón-Pattichis et al., 2018).”
From Exploring AR and VR Tools in Mathematics Education Through Culturally Responsive Pedagogies (2024) · cites this paper as Celedón-Pattichis et al., 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring AR and VR Tools in Mathematics Education Through Culturally Responsive Pedagogies
Bertrand, M. G., Sezer, H. B., & Namukasa, I. K. (2024) · Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s40751-024-00152-x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Celedón-Pattichis, S., Borden, L. L., Pape, S. J., Clements, D. H., Peters, S. A., Males, J. R., Chapman, O., & Leonard, J.
- Affiliations
- 1 University of New Mexico
- St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Denver (US)
- University of Louisville (US)
- 6 Lincoln Public Schools
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Venue
- Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-389
- ISSN
- 0021-8251 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-2306
- OpenAlex
- W2914952883
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 18.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- asset-based approach, equity in mathematics education, systemic change, culturally sustaining pedagogy, storylines, mathematics teacher identity, mathematics education research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review