Cited by 105Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesCritical Race Theory in EducationMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Asset-Based Approaches to Equitable Mathematics Education Research and Practice

Celedón-Pattichis, Sylvia, Borden, Lunney Lisa, Pape, Stephen J., Clements, Douglas H., Peters, Susan A., Males, Joshua R., Chapman, Olive, Leonard, Jacqueline·2018·Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Abstract

In July 2017, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) released a new mission statement that shifts the organization's primary focus to supporting and advocating for the highest quality mathematics teaching and learning for all students. A key strategy for achieving this goal is to advance “a culture of equity where each and every person has access to high quality teaching and is empowered as a learner and doer of mathematics” (NCTM, 2017, “Strategic Framework,” para. 2). Increasing equity and ensuring the highest quality mathematics teaching and learning for all students requires systemic change (National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics [NCSM] & TODOS: Mathematics for ALL, 2016). As educators are called to enact NCTM's new mission, we acknowledge that such change is complex. We also acknowledge that our own experiences conducting equity work that is grounded in an asset-based approach are at different stages of development, ranging from beginning levels to lived experiences as diverse mathematics learners and mathematics education researchers. We see this change in mission as a call to both act politically (Aguirre et al., 2017) and to change story lines (i.e., “broad, culturally shared narrative[s]”; Herbel-Eisenmann et al., 2016, p. 104) that dominate the public perception of mathematics learning and teaching. We acknowledge that systemic barriers are part of a larger educational issue, but for the purposes of this commentary, we focus on mathematics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0373

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CRMT tool provides a culturally responsive approach to teaching mathematics in the classroom.

    “and it provides a culturally responsive approach to teaching mathematics in the classroom (Abdulrahim & Orosco, 2020; Bonner, 2021; Celedón-Pattichis et al., 2018).”

    From Exploring AR and VR Tools in Mathematics Education Through Culturally Responsive Pedagogies (2024) · cites this paper as Celedón-Pattichis et al., 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Celedón-Pattichis, S., Borden, L. L., Pape, S. J., Clements, D. H., Peters, S. A., Males, J. R., Chapman, O., & Leonard, J.
Affiliations
  • 1 University of New Mexico
  • St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • 6 Lincoln Public Schools
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Wyoming (US)
Venue
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Published
2018-07
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
373-389
ISSN
  • 0021-8251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-2306
OpenAlex
W2914952883
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6
FWCI
18.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
asset-based approach, equity in mathematics education, systemic change, culturally sustaining pedagogy, storylines, mathematics teacher identity, mathematics education research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review