The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl
Open accessAbstract
The policy specified that timber harvest could be restricted through land-use plan ning to achieve habitat objectives for such species. In response, the BLM provided some habitat through land-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental Variation and the Persistence of Small Populations
Stacey, P. B., & Taper, M. (1992) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/1941886 · Cited by 375
Taylor, A. H., & Skinner, C. N. (1998) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00342-9 · Cited by 334
Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x · Cited by 272
Stephens, S. L. (2004) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.04.017 · Cited by 85
Effects of fire on spotted owl site occupancy in a late-successional forest
Roberts, S. L., van Wagtendonk, J. W., Miles, A. K., & Kelt, D. A. (2011) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.002 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, J. W., Forsman, E. D., Lint, J. B., Meslow, E. C., Noon, B. R., Verner, J., States., U., States., U., States., U., Service, U. S. F. A. W., & States., U.
- Published
- 1990
- OpenAlex
- W1568506796
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.34
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5962/bhl.title.124040
- The paper
- Thomas, J. W., Forsman, E. D., Lint, J. B., Meslow, E. C., Noon, B. R., Verner, J., States., U., States., U., States., U., Service, U. S. F. A. W., & States., U. (1990). A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.124040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
