Experimental pollination; an outline of the ecology of flowers and insects, by Frederic E. Clements and Frances L. Long.
Open accessAbstract
Page 2. Normal and Experimental Pol- lination (Continued). Chamaenerium angustifolium (Cont.).Behavior 45 Experiments 48 Change of position 48 Racemes inverted 48 Mutilation 48 Floral envelopes removed. . .48 Upper petals and the in- cluded sepal removed .... Petals split to the base Pentstemon glaucus Normal pollination Normal behavior Experiments Mutilation Upper lobes split to base ... Lower lip removed Outer lobes of lower lip re- moved Staminode removed CONTENTS Page 2. Normal and Experimental Pol- lination (Continued).Pentstemon glaucus (Cont.).Middle lobe of the lower lip removed 77 Upper lip removed 77 Pentstemon secundiflorus 77 Normal pollination 77 Behavior 77 Calendar 77 Experiments 77 Odor 77 Powders and extracts 77 Cotton wads sprinkled with peppermint
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The few field studies that examine butterfly color preference suggest that context-dependent color preference may be common.
“The few field studies that examine butterfly color preference suggest that context‐dependent color preference may be common (Clements, 1923; Pohl, Van Wyk, & Campbell, 2011) making the case for future studies that explore color preference in natural contexts.”
From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Clements, 1923
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
Briggs, H. M., Graham, S., Switzer, C. M., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/210377 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“The few field studies that examine butterfly color preference suggest that context- dependent color preference may be common (Clements, 1923; Pohl, Van Wyk, & Campbell, 2011) making the case for future studies that explore color preference in natural contexts.”
Background
- Authors
- Clements, F. E., & Long, F. L.
- Venue
- Carnegie Institution of Washington eBooks
- Publisher
- Carnegie Institution of Washington,
- Published
- 1923
- OpenAlex
- W2499156836
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Carnegie Institution of Washington eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Keywords
- flower morphology, floral scent, insect pollinators
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
