Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Age and area; a study in geographical distribution and origin of species,

Open access
Willis, J. C.·1922

Abstract

Some thirty years ago, a pupil of the strictest school of natural selection, and enthusiastic in my belief in its principles, I set out upon a course of independent observation of nature.Ten years of such work convinced me that a simpler explanation of phenomena was always to be found, and one that seemed more in accordance with the facts; and I endeavoured-with what success this book will show-to free myself from the trammels of the natural selection theory, and to work as if I had found myself in another planet where scientific investigation was just beginning.Stationed in one of the best centres in the tropics (where the phenomena of distribution are more impressive than in Europe), badly handicapped in laboratory work by a serious accident, and finding my chief pleasure in travellingabout the world to see its vegetation-I took up the study of distribution, in which I had always taken much interest.Here, as elsewhere, it was soon evident that the current theories provided an explanation that was not only unnecessarily complex, but one that did not explain.As one of my critics words it, "for some reason the plant has advantages which enable it to spread"; and beyond that point we cannot go.Gradually it became clear to me that plants spread very slowly, but at an average rate determined by the various causes acting upon them, so that age forms a measure of dispersal when one is dealing with allied and similar forms.Age as an explanation of spread is enormously simpler than natural selection, and that it is probably valid is shown by the way in which it can be used for prediction.An opponent re- marks that "it is too simple to be true," but this very simplicity seems to me a strong reason in favour of its adoption, at any rate as a preliminary hypothesis.Of two explanations take the simpler, is an old rule, and as Hooker has said, "no speculation is idle or fruitless, that is not opposed to truth or to probability, and which, while it coordinates a body of well-established facts, does so without violence to nature, and with a due regard to the vi PREFACE possible results of future discoveries."To find explanation of the facts of distribution under the current theories has always seemed a very hopeless task, and any hypothesis that offers a way out should at least receive attention.No hypothesis can, after all, alter the facts, though it may show ways in which to accumulate new ones.In the second part of the book, I have pushed my hypothesis to what seem to me its logical conclusions, conclusions which are sometimes subversive of received opinions.To be compelled

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5962/bhl.title.70451

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Willis, J. C.
Published
1922
OpenAlex
W2041356802
Cited by
233
References
0
FWCI
21.09
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age and area; a study in geographical distribution and origin of species,. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5962/bhl.title.70451
The paper
Willis, J. C. (1922). Age and area; a study in geographical distribution and origin of species,. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.70451

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.