Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Boreal and Western North American Plants in the Late Pleistocene of Vermont

Miller, Norton G., Thompson, Gary G·1979·Journal of the Arnold Arboretum.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5962/p.185883

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lowland deposits in the Connecticut River valley contain macrofossils that document a diverse late-glacial flora and a variety of tundra plant communities.

    “Lowland deposits in the Connecticut River valley (Miller, 1992(Miller, , 1995;;Miller and Thompson, 1979), south and west of the White Mountains, contain macrofossils that document a diverse late-glacial flora and a variety of tundra plant communities.”

    From Late-Quaternary history of the alpine flora of the New Hampshire White Mountains (2002) · cites this paper as Miller and Thompson, 1979

  • Although these species suggest neutral soil conditions, the presence of ericads in late-glacial time suggests that neutral soils did not persist for long; humus probably began to accumulate in protected sites even during the late-glacial.

    “Although these species suggest neutral soil conditions, the presence of ericads in late-glacial time suggests that neutral soils did not persist for long; humus probably began to accumulate in protected sites even during the late-glacial (Miller and Thompson 1979, Davis 1983, Davis et al. 1985).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miller, N. G., & Thompson, G. G.
Venue
Journal of the Arnold Arboretum.
Published
1979
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
167-218
ISSN
0004-2625
Cited by
32
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review