Cited by 98Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Coastwide distribution and ocean migration patterns of stream- and ocean-type Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha

Open access
Healey, M. C.·1983·The Canadian field-naturalist

Abstract

Healey, M

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5962/p.355044

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A central dogma in salmon ecology and management often constrains juvenile life history diversity to ocean type and stream type juveniles, denoting whether individuals out-migrate to the ocean before or after their first year of life.

    “A central dogma in salmon ecology and management often constrains juvenile life history diversity to ocean type and stream type juveniles, denoting whether individuals out-migrate to the ocean before or after their first year of life [7, 8].”

    From Estimating Common Growth Patterns in Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Diverse Genetic Stocks and a Large Spatial Extent (2016) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) treats stream- and ocean-type Chinook as two life-history types, and the Ocean Distribution section distinguishes recently emerged ocean-type fry migrants from stream-type smolts. These passages support the two-type distinction and differing freshwater residence, but do not establish that salmon ecology or management treats it as a ‘central dogma’ that constrains recognition of juvenile diversity. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Gilbert, C. H. 1913. Age at maturity of the Pacific coast salmon of the genus Oncorhynchus. Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries 32: 1-22.
  2. Hartt, A.C. 1980. Juvenile salmonids in the oceanic ecosystem-the critical first summer. Pp. 25-58 in Sal- monid ecosystems of the north Pacific. Edited by W. J. McNeil and D. C. Himsworth. Oregon State University Press, Corvalis, Oregon.
  3. Healey, M.C. 1980a. Utilization of the Nanaimo River estuary by juvenile chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tsha- wytscha. Fishery Bulletin 77: 653-668.
  4. Healey, M. C. 1980b. The ecology of juvenile salmon in Georgia Strait, British Columbia. Pp. 203-230 in Sal- monid ecosystems of the north Pacific. Edited by W. J. McNeil and D. C. Himsworth. Oregon State University Press, Corvalis, Oregon.
  5. chus tshawytscha (Walbaum). Fisheries Bulletin 66: 165-180.
  6. Kristiansson, A. C., and J.D. McIntyre. 1976. Genetic variation in chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from the Columbia River and three Oregon coastal rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 105: 620-623.
  7. Major, R. L.,andJ. L. Meghell. 1969. Egg-to-migrant sur- vival of spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawyt- scha) in the Yakima River, Washington. Fishery Bulletin 67: 347-359.
  8. Manzer, J. I., T. Ishida, A. E. Peterson, and M. G. Hana- van. 1965. Salmon of the north Pacific Part V. Offshore distribution of salmon. International North Pacific Fisheries Commission Bulletin 15. 452 pp.
  9. Meehan, W.R., and D.B. Siniff. 1962. A study of the downstream migrations of anadromous fishes in the Taku River, Alaska. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 99: 399-407.
  10. Reimers, P. E. 1971. The length of residence of juvenile fall chinook salmon in Sixes River, Oregon. Ph.D thesis, Oregon State University 99 pp.
  11. Rich, W. H. 1925. Growth and degree of maturity of chi- nook salmon in the ocean. Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries 41: 15-90.
  12. Ricker, W. E. 1972. Heredity and environmental factors affecting certain salmonid populations. Pp. 19-160 in The stock concept in Pacific salmon. Edited by R. Simon and P. Larkin. H. R. McMillan Lectures in Fisheries. Univer- sity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
  13. Wright, S., R. Kolb and R. Brix. 1972. Size and age charac- teristics of chinook salmon taken by Washington's com- mercial troll and ocean sport fisheries, 1963-1969. Pacific Marine Fisheries Commission Bulletin 8: 38-48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Healey, M. C.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Healey, M. C.
Venue
The Canadian field-naturalist
Published
1983
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
427-433
ISSN
0008-3550 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391459238
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Canadian Field-Naturalist (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, ocean migration, salmon life history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review