The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Methods and Applications
Open accessAbstract
RETRACTION NOTICE This article has been retracted due to violating Good Publication Practice and not complying to EJOPS's/PsychOpen's Ethical Guidelines on plagiarism and redundant or concurrent Publication. No abstract available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 · Cited by 2,362
What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review
Harrison, J. D., Young, J. M., Price, M. A., Butow, P. N., & Solomon, M. J. (2009) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5 · Cited by 905
Montazeri, A. (2008) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/1756-9966-27-32 · Cited by 770
Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., Lundy, J. J., Sloan, J. A., Revicki, D. A., Lenderking, W. R., Cella, D., & Basch, E. (2009) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x · Cited by 537
Kwak, M., Zebrack, B. J., Meeske, K. A., Embry, L., Aguilar, C., Block, R., Hayes-Lattin, B., Li, Y., Butler, M., & Cole, S. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.45.9222 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Theofilou, P.
- Venue
- Europe’s Journal of Psychology
- Published
- 2013-02-28
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 207-209
- ISSN
- 1841-0413 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1893510803
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Methods and Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5964/ejop.v9i1.411
- The paper
- Theofilou, P. (2013). Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Methods and Applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i1.411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
